Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36900857›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

A Framework and System Design for Medicines Resources Allocation: A Multi-Stakeholder Assessment of Processes and Electronic Platform Needs.

Abdullah Alanazi, Ibtihal Alshatri, Bakheet Aldosari

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Abdullah AlanaziHealth Informatics Department, King Saud Ibn Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh 11481, Saudi Arabia.
Ibtihal AlshatriKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh 14611, Saudi Arabia.
Bakheet AldosariHealth Informatics Department, King Saud Ibn Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh 11481, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Utilizing resources effectively is becoming more critical, especially with the ever-increasing healthcare cost. Little is known about the current practices used by healthcare organizations for the procurement, allocation, and utilization of medical resources. Moreover, the available literature needed to be enriched to bridge the link between resource utilization and allocation processes' performance and outcomes. This study investigated the processes that major healthcare facilities in Saudi Arabia apply to procure, allocate and utilize medicines resources. The work explored the role of electronic systems and provided a system design and conceptual framework to enhance the availability and utilization of resources. A three-part multi-method, multi-field (healthcare and operational), and multi-level exploratory and descriptive qualitative research design were used to collect the data that was analyzed and interrupted to feed the "future state" model. The findings demonstrated the current state procedure and discussed the challenges and the experts' opinions on developing the framework. The framework includes various elements and perspectives and is designed based on the results of the first part and was further validated by experts who were optimistic about the inclusiveness of this framework. Some major technical, operational, and human factors were perceived as obstacles by the subjects. Decision-makers can adopt the conceptual framework to gain insights into interrelated objects, entities, and processes. The findings of this study can imply future directions for research and practices.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHumansQualitative ResearchSaudi Arabiaconceptual frameworkmedicinesprocurementresources allocationsystem design

Identifiers

PMID36900857
PMCPMC10001098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read3
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.