Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36900674›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Variation in Communication and Family Visiting Policies in Italian Intensive Care Units during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Secondary Analysis of the COVISIT International Survey.

Barbara Simone, Mariachiara Ippolito, Pasquale Iozzo, Francesco Zuccaro, Antonino Giarratano, Maurizio Cecconi, Alexis Tabah, Andrea Cortegiani

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Barbara SimoneDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Science, University of Palermo, Via Liborio Giuffrè 5, 90127 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6276-8109
Mariachiara IppolitoDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Science, University of Palermo, Via Liborio Giuffrè 5, 90127 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9851-6301
Pasquale IozzoDepartment of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Emergency, University Hospital Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Francesco ZuccaroDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Ospedale Madonna delle Grazie, Azienda Sanitaria Matera, 75100 Matera, Italy.
Antonino GiarratanoDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Science, University of Palermo, Via Liborio Giuffrè 5, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Maurizio CecconiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy.
Alexis TabahIntensive Care Unit, Redcliffe Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Services, Redcliffe, QLD 4020, Australia.
Andrea CortegianiDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Science, University of Palermo, Via Liborio Giuffrè 5, 90127 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1416-9993

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring COVID-19 pandemic, restrictions to in-person visiting of caregivers to patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU) were applied in many countries. Our aim was to describe the variations in communication and family visiting policies in Italian ICUs during the pandemic.

methodsA secondary analysis from the COVISIT international survey was conducted, focusing on data from Italy.

resultsItalian ICUs provided 118 (18%) responses out of 667 responses collected worldwide. A total of 12 Italian ICUs were at the peak of COVID-19 admissions at the time of the survey and 42/118 had 90% or more of patients admitted to ICU affected by COVID-19. During the COVID-19 peak, 74% of Italian ICUs adopted a no-in-person-visiting policy. This remained the most common strategy (67%) at the time of the survey. Information to families was provided by regular phone calls (81% in Italy versus 47% for the rest of the world). Virtual visiting was available for 69% and most commonly performed using devices provided by the ICU (71% in Italy versus 36% outside Italy).

conclusionOur study showed that restrictions to the ICU applied during the COVID-19 pandemic were still in use at the time of the survey. The main means of communication with caregivers were telephone and virtual meetings.

Indexed as

communicationCOVID-19ICUItalyvisiting policies

Identifiers

PMID36900674
PMCPMC10001082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read95
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.