Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36900671›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Brain Analysis with a Complex Network Approach in Stroke Patients Based on Electroencephalography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Borhan Asadi, Juan Nicolás Cuenca-Zaldivar, Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari, Jaime Ibáñez, Pablo Herrero, Sandra Calvo

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Effect of Dual-Task Training on the Number of EEG Bands in Stroke Patients.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Borhan AsadiDepartment of Physiatry and Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, IIS Aragon, University of Zaragoza, C/Domingo Miral s/n, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7505-7958
Juan Nicolás Cuenca-ZaldivarGrupo de Investigación en Fisioterapia y Dolor, Departamento de Enfermería y Fisioterapia, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Alcalá, 28801 Alcalá de Henares, Spain.
Noureddin Nakhostin AnsariResearch Center for War-Affected People, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran P.O. Box 14155-6559, Iran.
Jaime IbáñezBSICoS Group, IIS Aragón, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8439-151X
Pablo HerreroDepartment of Physiatry and Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, IIS Aragon, University of Zaragoza, C/Domingo Miral s/n, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9201-0120
Sandra CalvoDepartment of Physiatry and Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, IIS Aragon, University of Zaragoza, C/Domingo Miral s/n, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1674-7788

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeBrain function can be networked, and these networks typically present drastic changes after having suffered a stroke. The objective of this systematic review was to compare EEG-related outcomes in adults with stroke and healthy individuals with a complex network approach.

methodsThe literature search was performed in the electronic databases PubMed, Cochrane and ScienceDirect from their inception until October 2021.

resultsTen studies were selected, nine of which were cohort studies. Five of them were of good quality, whereas four were of fair quality. Six studies showed a low risk of bias, whereas the other three studies presented a moderate risk of bias. In the network analysis, different parameters such as the path length, cluster coefficient, small-world index, cohesion and functional connection were used. The effect size was small and not significant in favor of the group of healthy subjects (Hedges'g = 0.189 [-0.714, 1.093], Z = 0.582,

conclusionsThe systematic review found that there are structural differences between the brain network of post-stroke patients and healthy individuals as well as similarities. However, there was no specific distribution network to allows us to differentiate them and, therefore, more specialized and integrated studies are needed.

Indexed as

brain function networkelectroencephalographystroke

Identifiers

PMID36900671
PMCPMC10000667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read13
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.