Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36900637›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

The Chain of Custody in the Era of Modern Forensics: From the Classic Procedures for Gathering Evidence to the New Challenges Related to Digital Data.

Tommaso D'Anna, Maria Puntarello, Giovanni Cannella, Giovanni Scalzo, Roberto Buscemi, Stefania Zerbo, Antonina Argo

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Interpol review of forensic science management, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026
    Review
  2. Towards an Asian registry of wrongful convictions.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tommaso D'AnnaGeneral Hospital, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 129, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Maria PuntarelloDepartment of Health Promotion, Maternal and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, Section of Forensic Medicine, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3094-5908
Giovanni CannellaDepartment of Health Promotion, Maternal and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, Section of Forensic Medicine, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Giovanni ScalzoDepartment of Health Promotion, Maternal and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, Section of Forensic Medicine, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Roberto BuscemiDepartment of Health Promotion, Maternal and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, Section of Forensic Medicine, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Stefania ZerboDepartment of Health Promotion, Maternal and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, Section of Forensic Medicine, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Antonina ArgoDepartment of Health Promotion, Maternal and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, Section of Forensic Medicine, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9964-0184

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to renew the interest and attention for the chain of custody in forensic medicine, its establishment and maintenance, protecting the integrity and validity of evidence as well as to analyze how over time the establishment of the chain of custody and the collection of evidence has evolved also in function of the advent of technology and the use of electronic devices connected to the network. The analysis of the various aspects of the chain of custody demonstrates how necessary it is for the professional figures involved in the phases of the investigation (especially those who manage the evidence and who have, therefore, designated the assignment) to know the procedures to follow, trace the movement and the handling of objects subjected to seizure, also for the purposes of toxicological and/or histological investigations. The knowledge of interferences or complications helps to reduce errors and safeguard the validity of the evidence, assuring the proceeding judicial authority that the evidence is authentic and that it is, in other words, the same evidence seized at the scene of the crime. Furthermore, the issue is particularly felt today, with the recent need to guarantee the originality of digital data. Following a careful review and analysis of the literature currently available in this regard, it is worth adding that further efforts are needed to formulate internationally validated guidelines, harmonizing the different reference criteria in forensic science and medical areas, given the current absence of good international practices valid in the field and applicable both in the case of physical evidence and in the case of seizure of digital evidence.

Indexed as

chaincustodydigital dataevidenceforensicsguidelinesinnovative technologies

Identifiers

PMID36900637
PMCPMC10000967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.