Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36900485›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Benchmarking and Validation of a Bioinformatics Workflow for Meat Species Identification Using 16S rDNA Metabarcoding.

Grégoire Denay, Laura Preckel, Henning Petersen, Klaus Pietsch, Anne Wöhlke, Claudia Brünen-Nieweler

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Grégoire DenayChemical and Veterinary Analytical Institute Rhein-Ruhr-Wupper (CVUA-RRW), Deutscher Ring 100, 47798 Krefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8850-3029
Laura PreckelChemical and Veterinary Analytical Institute Muensterland-Emscher-Lippe (CVUA-MEL), Joseph-Koenig-Strasse 40, 48147 Muenster, Germany.
Henning PetersenChemical and Veterinary Analytical Institute Ostwestfalen-Lippe (CVUA-OWL), Westerfeldstrasse 1, 32758 Detmold, Germany.
Klaus PietschState Institute for Chemical and Veterinary Analysis Freiburg (CVUA-FR), Bissierstrasse 5, 79114 Freiburg, Germany.
Anne WöhlkeFood and Veterinary Institute, Lower Saxony State Office for Consumer Protection and Food Safety (LAVES), Dresdenstrasse 2, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany.
Claudia Brünen-NiewelerChemical and Veterinary Analytical Institute Muensterland-Emscher-Lippe (CVUA-MEL), Joseph-Koenig-Strasse 40, 48147 Muenster, Germany.
Chemisches und Veterinäruntersuchungsamt Münsterland-Emscher-Lippe · DEChemisches und Veterinäruntersuchungsamt Karlsruhe · DEChemisches und Veterinäruntersuchungsamt Ostwestfalen-Lippe · DELower Saxony State Office for Consumer Protection and Food Safety · DE

Funding

Ministry for Environment, Agriculture, Conservation and Consumer Protection of the State of North Rhine-Westphalia 2020; AZ: 8.80.01.02.07
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA-metabarcoding is becoming more widely used for routine authentication of meat-based food and feed products. Several methods validating species identification methods through amplicon sequencing have already been published. These use a variety of barcodes and analysis workflows, however, no methodical comparison of available algorithms and parameter optimization are published hitherto for meat-based products' authenticity. Additionally, many published methods use very small subsets of the available reference sequences, thereby limiting the potential of the analysis and leading to over-optimistic performance estimates. We here predict and compare the ability of published barcodes to distinguish taxa in the BLAST NT database. We then use a dataset of 79 reference samples, spanning 32 taxa, to benchmark and optimize a metabarcoding analysis workflow for 16S rDNA Illumina sequencing. Furthermore, we provide recommendations as to the parameter choices, sequencing depth, and thresholds that should be used to analyze meat metabarcoding sequencing experiments. The analysis workflow is publicly available, and includes ready-to-use tools for validation and benchmarking.

Indexed as

amplicon sequencingbenchmarkingbioinformaticsDNA metabarcodingfood adulterationfood authenticitynext generation sequencingvalidation

Identifiers

PMID36900485
PMCPMC10000984
OpenAlexW4322499903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read1
measurements read86
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.