Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36900308›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Cancer Survival and Travel Time to Nearest Reference Care Center for 10 Cancer Sites: An Analysis of 21 French Cancer Registries.

Joséphine Gardy, Sarah Wilson, Anne-Valérie Guizard, Véronique Bouvier, Laure Tron, Ludivine Launay, Arnaud Alves, On Behalf Of The Francim Group, Guy Launoy, Florence Molinié and 2 more

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. A novel approach to incorporate frontier areas into urban-rural geographic classifications: Integrated Metropolitan-to-Frontier Area Codes.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Joséphine GardyCalvados General Tumor Registry, Centre François Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4368-6981
Sarah WilsonANTICIPE U1086 INSERM-UCN, University of Caen, 14000 Caen, France.
Anne-Valérie GuizardCalvados General Tumor Registry, Centre François Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France.
Véronique BouvierCalvados Digestive Cancer Registry, University Hospital of Caen, 14000 Caen, France.
Laure TronANTICIPE U1086 INSERM-UCN, University of Caen, 14000 Caen, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2091-6652
Ludivine LaunayANTICIPE U1086 INSERM-UCN, University of Caen, 14000 Caen, France.
Arnaud AlvesCalvados Digestive Cancer Registry, University Hospital of Caen, 14000 Caen, France.
On Behalf Of The Francim GroupFRANCIM Network (French National Network of Cancer Registries), 31000 Toulouse, France.
Guy LaunoyANTICIPE U1086 INSERM-UCN, University of Caen, 14000 Caen, France.
Florence MoliniéFRANCIM Network (French National Network of Cancer Registries), 31000 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0645-4017
Joséphine BryèreANTICIPE U1086 INSERM-UCN, University of Caen, 14000 Caen, France.
Olivier DejardinANTICIPE U1086 INSERM-UCN, University of Caen, 14000 Caen, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6561-1430

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe impact of several non-clinical factors on cancer survival is poorly understood. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of travel time to the nearest referral center on survival of patients with cancer. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe study used data from the French Network of Cancer Registries that combines all the French population-based cancer registries. For this study, we included the 10 most common solid invasive cancer sites in France between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2015, representing 160,634 cases. Net survival was measured and estimated using flexible parametric survival models. Flexible excess mortality modelling was performed to investigate the association between travel time to the nearest referral center and patient survival. To allow the most flexible effects, restricted cubic splines were used to investigate the influence of travel times to the nearest cancer center on excess hazard ratio.

resultsAmong the 1-year and 5-year net survival results, lower survival was observed for patients residing farthest from the referral center for half of the included cancer types. The remoteness gap in survival was estimated to be up to 10% at 5 years for skin melanoma in men and 7% for lung cancer in women. The pattern of the effect of travel time was highly different according to tumor type, being either linear, reverse U-shape, non-significant, or better for more remote patients. For some sites restricted cubic splines of the effect of travel time on excess mortality were observed with a higher excess risk ratio as travel time increased.

conclusionsFor numerous cancer sites, our results reveal geographical inequalities, with remote patients experiencing a worse prognosis, aside from the notable exception of prostate cancer. Future studies should evaluate the remoteness gap in more detail with more explanatory factors.

Indexed as

cancergeographical accessibilityoutcomessurvivaltravel time

Identifiers

PMID36900308
PMCPMC10000621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read17
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.