Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36900261›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

A Comparative Study of Automated Deep Learning Segmentation Models for Prostate MRI.

Nuno M Rodrigues, Sara Silva, Leonardo Vanneschi, Nickolas Papanikolaou

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nuno M RodriguesLASIGE, Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-5312-8276
Sara SilvaLASIGE, Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8223-4799
Leonardo VanneschiNOVA Information Management School (NOVA IMS), Campus de Campolide, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 1070-312 Lisboa, Portugal.
Nickolas PapanikolaouChampalimaud Foundation, Centre for the Unknown, 1400-038 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-3298-2072

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDB/00408/2020; UIDP/00408/2020; DSAIPA/DS/0113/2019; 2021/05322/BD.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer is one of the most common forms of cancer globally, affecting roughly one in every eight men according to the American Cancer Society. Although the survival rate for prostate cancer is significantly high given the very high incidence rate, there is an urgent need to improve and develop new clinical aid systems to help detect and treat prostate cancer in a timely manner. In this retrospective study, our contributions are twofold: First, we perform a comparative unified study of different commonly used segmentation models for prostate gland and zone (peripheral and transition) segmentation. Second, we present and evaluate an additional research question regarding the effectiveness of using an object detector as a pre-processing step to aid in the segmentation process. We perform a thorough evaluation of the deep learning models on two public datasets, where one is used for cross-validation and the other as an external test set. Overall, the results reveal that the choice of model is relatively inconsequential, as the majority produce non-significantly different scores, apart from nnU-Net which consistently outperforms others, and that the models trained on data cropped by the object detector often generalize better, despite performing worse during cross-validation.

Indexed as

deep learningprostate cancerprostate detectionprostate segmentation

Identifiers

PMID36900261
PMCPMC10001231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read18
table measurements read5
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.