Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36900230›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

A Phase 2 Trial of Ibrutinib and Nivolumab in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma.

Walter Hanel, Polina Shindiapina, David A Bond, Yazeed Sawalha, Narendranath Epperla, Timothy Voorhees, Rina Li Welkie, Ying Huang, Gregory K Behbehani, Xiaoli Zhang and 12 more

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Walter HanelDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 460 W 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8982-6877
Polina ShindiapinaDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 460 W 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
David A BondDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 460 W 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Yazeed SawalhaDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 460 W 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6355-3671
Narendranath EpperlaDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 460 W 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8216-3457
Timothy VoorheesDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 460 W 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7603-6454
Rina Li WelkieDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 460 W 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9477-4581
Ying HuangDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 460 W 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Gregory K BehbehaniDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 460 W 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Xiaoli ZhangCenter for Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2495-4568
Eric McLaughlinCenter for Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Wing K ChanDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 460 W 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Jonathan E BrammerDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 460 W 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Samantha JaglowskiDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 460 W 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
John C ReneauDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 460 W 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6838-2410
Beth A ChristianDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 460 W 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Basem M WilliamBlood and Marrow Transplant and Cell Therapy Program, OhioHealth, 500 Thomas Ln #A3, Columbus, OH 43214, USA.
Jonathon B CohenDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, 1365 Clifton Road NE, B4013, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Robert A BaiocchiDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 460 W 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Kami MaddocksDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 460 W 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Kristie A BlumDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, 1365 Clifton Road NE, B4013, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Lapo AlinariDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 460 W 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8870-4162

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Daniel G. Stover · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRelapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) remains a difficult treatment challenge. Although checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) have provided clinical benefit for these patients, responses are generally not durable, and progression eventually occurs. Discovering combination therapies which maximize the immune response of CPI therapy may overcome this limitation. We hypothesized that adding ibrutinib to nivolumab will lead to deeper and more durable responses in cHL by promoting a more favorable immune microenvironment leading to enhanced T-cell-mediated anti-lymphoma responses.

methodsWe conducted a single arm, phase II clinical trial testing the efficacy of nivolumab in combination with ibrutinib in patients ≥18 years of age with histologically confirmed cHL who had received at least one prior line of therapy. Prior treatment with CPIs was allowed. Ibrutinib was administered at 560 mg daily until progression in combination with nivolumab 3 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks for up to 16 cycles. The primary objective was complete response rate (CRR) assessed per Lugano criteria. Secondary objectives included overall response rate (ORR), safety, progression free survival (PFS), and duration of response (DoR).

resultsA total of 17 patients from two academic centers were enrolled. The median age of all patients was 40 (range 20-84). The median number of prior lines of treatment was five (range 1-8), including 10 patients (58.8%) who had progressed on prior nivolumab therapy. Most treatment related events were mild (<Grade 3) and expected from the individual side effect profiles of ibrutinib and nivolumab. In the intent to treat population (

conclusionsCombined nivolumab and ibrutinib led to a CRR of 29.4% in R/R cHL. Although this study did not meet its primary efficacy endpoint of a CRR of 50%, likely due to enrollment of heavily pretreated patients including over half of who had progressed on prior nivolumab treatment, responses that were achieved with combination ibrutinib and nivolumab therapy tended to be durable even in the case of prior progression on nivolumab therapy. Larger studies investigating the efficacy of dual BTK inhibitor/immune checkpoint blockade, particularly in patients who had previously progressed on checkpoint blockade therapy, are warranted.

Indexed as

Hodgkin’s lymphomaibrutinibnivolumab

Identifiers

PMID36900230
PMCPMC10000669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read59
identifiers read2
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.