ArticleCancers2023
Interpretable and Reliable Oral Cancer Classifier with Attention Mechanism and Expert Knowledge Embedding via Attention Map.
Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A scoping review of human-AI collaboration patterns and task divisions in healthcare applications.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Explainable deep learning framework incorporating medical knowledge for insulin titration in diabetes.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Integrating artificial intelligence with smartphone-based imaging for cancer detection in vivo.Biosensors & bioelectronics · 2025Review
- Recent advance in early oral lesion diagnosis: the application of artificial intelligence-assisted endoscopy.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Two-step pipeline for oral diseases detection and classification: a deep learning approach.Frontiers in oral health · 2025Article
- Mapping the Use of Artificial Intelligence-Based Image Analysis for Clinical Decision-Making in Dentistry: A Scoping Review.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Convolutional neural networks have demonstrated excellent performance in oral cancer detection and classification. However, the end-to-end learning strategy makes CNNs hard to interpret, and it can be challenging to fully understand the decision-making procedure. Additionally, reliability is also a significant challenge for CNN based approaches. In this study, we proposed a neural network called the attention branch network (ABN), which combines the visual explanation and attention mechanisms to improve the recognition performance and interpret the decision-making simultaneously. We also embedded expert knowledge into the network by having human experts manually edit the attention maps for the attention mechanism. Our experiments have shown that ABN performs better than the original baseline network. By introducing the Squeeze-and-Excitation (SE) blocks to the network, the cross-validation accuracy increased further. Furthermore, we observed that some previously misclassified cases were correctly recognized after updating by manually editing the attention maps. The cross-validation accuracy increased from 0.846 to 0.875 with the ABN (Resnet18 as baseline), 0.877 with SE-ABN, and 0.903 after embedding expert knowledge. The proposed method provides an accurate, interpretable, and reliable oral cancer computer-aided diagnosis system through visual explanation, attention mechanisms, and expert knowledge embedding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.