Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36900161›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Predicting Patient-Specific Tumor Dynamics: How Many Measurements Are Necessary?

Isha Harshe, Heiko Enderling, Renee Brady-Nicholls

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Isha HarsheDepartment of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Heiko EnderlingDepartment of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9696-6410
Renee Brady-NichollsDepartment of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1759-8283

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acquiring sufficient data is imperative to accurately predict tumor growth dynamics and effectively treat patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the number of volume measurements necessary to predict breast tumor growth dynamics using the logistic growth model. The model was calibrated to tumor volume data from 18 untreated breast cancer patients using a varying number of measurements interpolated at clinically relevant timepoints with different levels of noise (0-20%). Error-to-model parameters and the data were compared to determine the sufficient number of measurements needed to accurately determine growth dynamics. We found that without noise, three tumor volume measurements are necessary and sufficient to estimate patient-specific model parameters. More measurements were required as the level of noise increased. Estimating the tumor growth dynamics was shown to depend on the tumor growth rate, clinical noise level, and acceptable error of the to-be-determined parameters. Understanding the relationship between these factors provides a metric by which clinicians can determine when sufficient data have been collected to confidently predict patient-specific tumor growth dynamics and recommend appropriate treatment options.

Indexed as

logistic growthpatient-specificprediction

Identifiers

PMID36900161
PMCPMC10000065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read22
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.