Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36900150›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

A Neural Network Model Combining [-2]proPSA, freePSA, Total PSA, Cathepsin D, and Thrombospondin-1 Showed Increased Accuracy in the Identification of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.

Francesco Gentile, Evelina La Civita, Bartolomeo Della Ventura, Matteo Ferro, Dario Bruzzese, Felice Crocetto, Pierre Tennstedt, Thomas Steuber, Raffaele Velotta, Daniela Terracciano

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. A hospital-based study of prostate biopsy results in Indian males.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Francesco GentileNanotechnology Research Centre, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1724-6301
Evelina La CivitaElicaDea, Spinoff of Federico II University, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0543-9031
Bartolomeo Della VenturaElicaDea, Spinoff of Federico II University, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2920-6187
Matteo FerroElicaDea, Spinoff of Federico II University, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9250-7858
Dario BruzzeseElicaDea, Spinoff of Federico II University, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9911-4646
Felice CrocettoDepartment of Neurosciences, Sciences of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4315-7660
Pierre TennstedtMartini-Klinik, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9237-3442
Thomas SteuberMartini-Klinik, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Raffaele VelottaDepartment of Physics "Ettore Pancini", University of Naples "Federico II", 80126 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1077-8353
Daniela TerraccianoElicaDea, Spinoff of Federico II University, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4296-429X

Funding

Italian Association for Cancer Research 25656University of Naples Federico II Finanziamento Ricerca di Ateneo 2020-Linea B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Prostate Health Index (PHI) and Proclarix (PCLX) have been proposed as blood-based tests for prostate cancer (PCa). In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of an artificial neural network (ANN)-based approach to develop a combinatorial model including PHI and PCLX biomarkers to recognize clinically significant PCa (csPCa) at initial diagnosis.

methodsTo this aim, we prospectively enrolled 344 men from two different centres. All patients underwent radical prostatectomy (RP). All men had a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) between 2 and 10 ng/mL. We used an artificial neural network to develop models that can identify csPCa efficiently. As inputs, the model uses [-2]proPSA, freePSA, total PSA, cathepsin D, thrombospondin, and age.

resultsThe output of the model is an estimate of the presence of a low or high Gleason score PCa defined at RP. After training on a dataset of up to 220 samples and optimization of the variables, the model achieved values as high as 78% for sensitivity and 62% for specificity for all-cancer detection compared with those of PHI and PCLX alone. For csPCa detection, the model showed 66% (95% CI 66-68%) for sensitivity and 68% (95% CI 66-68%) for specificity. These values were significantly different compared with those of PHI (

conclusionsOur preliminary study suggests that combining PHI and PCLX biomarkers may help to estimate, with higher accuracy, the presence of csPCa at initial diagnosis, allowing a personalized treatment approach. Further studies training the model on larger datasets are strongly encouraged to support the efficiency of this approach.

Indexed as

artificial neural networkPCLXPhiprostate cancertumor markers

Identifiers

PMID36900150
PMCPMC10000171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read16
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.