ArticleCancers2023
A Neural Network Model Combining [-2]proPSA, freePSA, Total PSA, Cathepsin D, and Thrombospondin-1 Showed Increased Accuracy in the Identification of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ubiquitination-Dependent LLGL2 Degradation Drives Colorectal Cancer Progression via THBS3 mRNA Stabilization.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Liquid Biopsy: Current advancements in clinical practice for bladder cancer.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2025Review
- Blood and urine-based biomarkers in prostate cancer: Current advances, clinical applications, and future directions.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2025Review
- Urinary Extracellular Vesicle Signatures as Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Clinical Predictors and Risk Factors of Gleason Score Upgrade: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Impact of Nerve-Sparing Techniques on Prostate-Specific Antigen Persistence Following Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Multivariable Analysis of Clinical and Pathological Predictors.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Meta Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Prostate Biopsy: A Comparison Between Transperineal and Transrectal Approach.Urology research & practice · 2025Review
- Decreased levels of PTCSC3 promote the deterioration of prostate cancer and affect the prognostic outcome of patients through sponge miR-182-5p.BMC urology · 2024Article
- A hospital-based study of prostate biopsy results in Indian males.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2024Article
- Identification and validation of an individualized metabolic prognostic signature for predicting the biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer based on the immune microenvironment.European journal of medical research · 2024Article
- BioPrev-C - development and validation of a contemporary prostate cancer risk calculator.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- The Potential of Extracellular Matrix- and Integrin Adhesion Complex-Related Molecules for Prostate Cancer Biomarker Discovery.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- The therapeutic effect of pelvic floor muscle training on stress urinary incontinence following prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational andrology and urology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Prostate Health Index (PHI) and Proclarix (PCLX) have been proposed as blood-based tests for prostate cancer (PCa). In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of an artificial neural network (ANN)-based approach to develop a combinatorial model including PHI and PCLX biomarkers to recognize clinically significant PCa (csPCa) at initial diagnosis.
methodsTo this aim, we prospectively enrolled 344 men from two different centres. All patients underwent radical prostatectomy (RP). All men had a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) between 2 and 10 ng/mL. We used an artificial neural network to develop models that can identify csPCa efficiently. As inputs, the model uses [-2]proPSA, freePSA, total PSA, cathepsin D, thrombospondin, and age.
resultsThe output of the model is an estimate of the presence of a low or high Gleason score PCa defined at RP. After training on a dataset of up to 220 samples and optimization of the variables, the model achieved values as high as 78% for sensitivity and 62% for specificity for all-cancer detection compared with those of PHI and PCLX alone. For csPCa detection, the model showed 66% (95% CI 66-68%) for sensitivity and 68% (95% CI 66-68%) for specificity. These values were significantly different compared with those of PHI (
conclusionsOur preliminary study suggests that combining PHI and PCLX biomarkers may help to estimate, with higher accuracy, the presence of csPCa at initial diagnosis, allowing a personalized treatment approach. Further studies training the model on larger datasets are strongly encouraged to support the efficiency of this approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.