ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Comparison of Ultra-Magnifying Endocytoscopic and Hematoxylin-Eosin-Stained Images of Lung Specimens.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endocytoscopy enables real-time observation of lesions at ultra-magnification. In the gastrointestinal and respiratory fields, endocytoscopic images are similar to hematoxylin-eosin-stained images. This study aimed to compare the nuclear features of pulmonary lesions in endocytoscopic and hematoxylin-eosin-stained images. We performed an endocytoscopy to observe resected specimens of normal lung tissue and lesions. Nuclear features were extracted using ImageJ. We analyzed five nuclear features: nuclear number per area, mean nucleus area, median circularity, coefficient of variation of roundness, and median Voronoi area. We conducted dimensionality reduction analyses for these features, followed by assessments of the inter-observer agreement among two pathologists and two pulmonologists to evaluate endocytoscopic videos. We analyzed the nuclear features of hematoxylin-eosin-stained and endocytoscopic images from 40 and 33 cases, respectively. Endocytoscopic and hematoxylin-eosin-stained images displayed a similar tendency for each feature, despite there being no correlation. Conversely, the dimensionality reduction analyses demonstrated similar distributions of normal lung and malignant clusters in both images, thus differentiating between the clusters. The diagnostic accuracy of the pathologists was 58.3% and 52.8% (κ-value 0.38, fair), and that of the pulmonologists was 50% and 47.2% (κ-value 0.33, fair). The five nuclear features of pulmonary lesions were similar in the endocytoscopic and hematoxylin-eosin-stained images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.