Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36900124›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Recent Advances in Ultrasound Breast Imaging: From Industry to Clinical Practice.

Orlando Catalano, Roberta Fusco, Federica De Muzio, Igino Simonetti, Pierpaolo Palumbo, Federico Bruno, Alessandra Borgheresi, Andrea Agostini, Michela Gabelloni, Carlo Varelli and 5 more

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Evolution of localization methods for non-palpable breast lesions: a literature review from a translational medicine perspective.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Orlando CatalanoDepartment of Radiology, Istituto Diagnostico Varelli, 80126 Naples, Italy.
Roberta FuscoMedical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, 80013 Naples, Italy.
Federica De MuzioDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.
Igino SimonettiDivision of Radiology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Pierpaolo PalumboDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Area of Cardiovascular and Interventional Imaging, Abruzzo Health Unit 1, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1514-0092
Federico BrunoDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Area of Cardiovascular and Interventional Imaging, Abruzzo Health Unit 1, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1444-2585
Alessandra BorgheresiDepartment of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5544-9468
Andrea AgostiniDepartment of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
Michela GabelloniDepartment of Translational Research, Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6668-499X
Carlo VarelliDepartment of Radiology, Istituto Diagnostico Varelli, 80126 Naples, Italy.
Antonio BarileDepartment of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0253-3583
Andrea GiovagnoniDepartment of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
Nicoletta GandolfoDiagnostic Imaging Department, Villa Scassi Hospital-ASL 3, Corso Scassi 1, 16149 Genoa, Italy.
Vittorio MieleItalian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7848-1567
Vincenza GranataDivision of Radiology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli", 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6601-3221

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast ultrasound (US) has undergone dramatic technological improvement through recent decades, moving from a low spatial resolution, grayscale-limited technique to a highly performing, multiparametric modality. In this review, we first focus on the spectrum of technical tools that have become commercially available, including new microvasculature imaging modalities, high-frequency transducers, extended field-of-view scanning, elastography, contrast-enhanced US, MicroPure, 3D US, automated US, S-Detect, nomograms, images fusion, and virtual navigation. In the subsequent section, we discuss the broadened current application of US in breast clinical scenarios, distinguishing among primary US, complementary US, and second-look US. Finally, we mention the still ongoing limitations and the challenging aspects of breast US.

Indexed as

breast imagingclinical practiceultrasound

Identifiers

PMID36900124
PMCPMC10000574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read6
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.