Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36900112›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Role of Machine Learning-Based CT Body Composition in Risk Prediction and Prognostication: Current State and Future Directions.

Tarig Elhakim, Kelly Trinh, Arian Mansur, Christopher Bridge, Dania Daye

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Future of CT body composition research: Methodological discrepancies and advances.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Fat-Free Mass: Friend or Foe to Metabolic Health?Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2025
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tarig ElhakimDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5038-9232
Kelly TrinhSchool of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, School of Medicine, Lubbock, TX 79430, USA.
Arian MansurHarvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2406-5127
Christopher BridgeDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Dania DayeDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CT body composition analysis has been shown to play an important role in predicting health and has the potential to improve patient outcomes if implemented clinically. Recent advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning have led to high speed and accuracy for extracting body composition metrics from CT scans. These may inform preoperative interventions and guide treatment planning. This review aims to discuss the clinical applications of CT body composition in clinical practice, as it moves towards widespread clinical implementation.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceCT body compositionmachine learningprognosticationrisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID36900112
PMCPMC10000509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read9
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.