ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
CBCT Images to an STL Model: Exploring the "Critical Factors" to Binarization Thresholds in STL Data Creation.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning-assisted CBCT segmentation provides reliable volumetric assessment of mandibular defects compared with micro-CT for 3D printing and surgical planning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Assessing the reliability of CBCT-based AI-generated STL files in diagnosing osseous changes of the mandibular condyle: a comparative study with ground truth diagnosis.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In-house fabrication of three-dimensional (3D) models for medical use has become easier in recent years. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images are increasingly used as source data for fabricating osseous 3D models. The creation of a 3D CAD model begins with the segmentation of hard and soft tissues of the DICOM images and the creation of an STL model; however, it can be difficult to determine the binarization threshold in CBCT images. In this study, how the different CBCT scanning and imaging conditions of two different CBCT scanners affect the determination of the binarization threshold was evaluated. The key to efficient STL creation through voxel intensity distribution analysis was then explored. It was found that determination of the binarization threshold is easy for image datasets with a large number of voxels, sharp peak shapes, and narrow intensity distributions. Although the intensity distribution of voxels varied greatly among the image datasets, it was difficult to find correlations between different X-ray tube currents or image reconstruction filters that explained the differences. The objective observation of voxel intensity distribution may contribute to the determination of the binarization threshold for 3D model creation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.