Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36900062›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Automated Detection and Classification of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using Deep Neural Networks.

Balasundaram Ananthakrishnan, Ayesha Shaik, Soham Kumar, S O Narendran, Khushi Mattu, Muthu Subash Kavitha

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Balasundaram AnanthakrishnanCentre for Cyber Physical Systems, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai 600127, India.
Ayesha ShaikSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai 600127, India.
Soham KumarSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai 600127, India.
S O NarendranSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai 600127, India.
Khushi MattuSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai 600127, India.
Muthu Subash KavithaSchool of Information and Data Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki 852-8521, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1676-561X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work aims to classify normal and carcinogenic cells in the oral cavity using two different approaches with an eye towards achieving high accuracy. The first approach extracts local binary patterns and metrics derived from a histogram from the dataset and is fed to several machine-learning models. The second approach uses a combination of neural networks as a backbone feature extractor and a random forest for classification. The results show that information can be learnt effectively from limited training images using these approaches. Some approaches use deep learning algorithms to generate a bounding box that can locate the suspected lesion. Other approaches use handcrafted textural feature extraction techniques and feed the resultant feature vectors to a classification model. The proposed method will extract the features pertaining to the images using pre-trained convolution neural networks (CNN) and train a classification model using the resulting feature vectors. By using the extracted features from a pre-trained CNN model to train a random forest, the problem of requiring a large amount of data to train deep learning models is bypassed. The study selected a dataset consisting of 1224 images, which were divided into two sets with varying resolutions.The performance of the model is calculated based on accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and the area under curve (AUC). The proposed work is able to produce a highest test accuracy of 96.94% and an AUC of 0.976 using 696 images of 400× magnification and a highest test accuracy of 99.65% and an AUC of 0.9983 using only 528 images of 100× magnification images.

Indexed as

CNNcomputer visionfeature extractionmedical image analysisoral cancer

Identifiers

PMID36900062
PMCPMC10001077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read8
measurements read54
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.