Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36900011›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Examining the Utility of Rapid Salivary C-Reactive Protein as a Predictor for Neonatal Sepsis: An Analytical Cross-Sectional Pilot Study.

Chaitra Ramavath, Shravan Kumar Katam, Venkateshwarlu Vardhelli, Saikiran Deshabhotla, Tejo Pratap Oleti

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Minimizing blood sampling in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Minimizing blood sampling in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chaitra RamavathDepartment of Neonatology, Fernandez Foundation, Fernandez Hospital, Unit-2, Opp. Old MLA Quarters, Hyderabad 500029, India.
Shravan Kumar KatamDepartment of Neonatology, Fernandez Foundation, Fernandez Hospital, Unit-2, Opp. Old MLA Quarters, Hyderabad 500029, India.
Venkateshwarlu VardhelliDepartment of Neonatology, Fernandez Foundation, Fernandez Hospital, Unit-2, Opp. Old MLA Quarters, Hyderabad 500029, India.
Saikiran DeshabhotlaDepartment of Neonatology, Fernandez Foundation, Fernandez Hospital, Unit-2, Opp. Old MLA Quarters, Hyderabad 500029, India.
Tejo Pratap OletiDepartment of Neonatology, Fernandez Foundation, Fernandez Hospital, Unit-2, Opp. Old MLA Quarters, Hyderabad 500029, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4597-0978

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the rapid bedside quantitative assessment of C-reactive protein (CRP) in saliva to serum CRP to predict blood culture-positive sepsis in neonates. The research was carried out over eight months at Fernandez Hospital in India (February 2021-September 2021). The study included 74 randomly selected neonates with clinical symptoms or risk factors of neonatal sepsis requiring blood culture evaluation. SpotSense rapid CRP test was conducted to estimate salivary CRP. In analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) on the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used. The study population's mean gestational age and median birth weight were 34.1 weeks (SD: ±4.8) and 2370 g (IQR: 1067-3182). The AUC on ROC curve analysis for predicting culture-positive sepsis was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.58 to 0.86,

Indexed as

C-reactive proteinCRPneonatal sepsissalivary CRP

Identifiers

PMID36900011
PMCPMC10000952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read40
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.