ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Attention Deep Feature Extraction from Brain MRIs in Explainable Mode: DGXAINet.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ensemble of Handcrafted and Learned Features for Colorectal Cancer Classification.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Enhanced EfficientNet-Extended Multimodal Parkinson's disease classification with Hybrid Particle Swarm and Grey Wolf Optimizer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Advanced dynamic ensemble framework with explainability driven insights for precision brain tumor classification across datasets.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- ViSwNeXtNet Deep Patch-Wise Ensemble of Vision Transformers and ConvNeXt for Robust Binary Histopathology Classification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Strategies to Improve the Robustness and Generalizability of Deep Learning Segmentation and Classification in Neuroimaging.BioMedInformatics · 2025Article
- Analysis of features of papillary thyroid carcinoma on color Doppler ultrasound images: implications for lymph node metastasis.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Explainable AI in Diagnostic Radiology for Neurological Disorders: A Systematic Review, and What Doctors Think About It.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Multi-modal deep learning for intelligent landscape design generation: A novel CBS3-LandGen model.PloS one · 2025Article
- Explainable Machine Learning Models for Brain Diseases: Insights from a Systematic Review.Neurology international · 2024Review
- A Pyramid Deep Feature Extraction Model for the Automatic Classification of Upper Extremity Fractures.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Blockchain-Based Deep CNN for Brain Tumor Prediction Using MRI Scans.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Examination of the Relationship between Peripheral Inflammation Markers and Impulsivity and Aggression in Schizophrenia Patients Involved and Not Involved in Crime.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence models do not provide information about exactly how the predictions are reached. This lack of transparency is a major drawback. Particularly in medical applications, interest in explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), which helps to develop methods of visualizing, explaining, and analyzing deep learning models, has increased recently. With explainable artificial intelligence, it is possible to understand whether the solutions offered by deep learning techniques are safe. This paper aims to diagnose a fatal disease such as a brain tumor faster and more accurately using XAI methods. In this study, we preferred datasets that are widely used in the literature, such as the four-class kaggle brain tumor dataset (Dataset I) and the three-class figshare brain tumor dataset (Dataset II). To extract features, a pre-trained deep learning model is chosen. DenseNet201 is used as the feature extractor in this case. The proposed automated brain tumor detection model includes five stages. First, training of brain MR images with DenseNet201, the tumor area was segmented with GradCAM. The features were extracted from DenseNet201 trained using the exemplar method. Extracted features were selected with iterative neighborhood component (INCA) feature selector. Finally, the selected features were classified using support vector machine (SVM) with 10-fold cross-validation. An accuracy of 98.65% and 99.97%, were obtained for Datasets I and II, respectively. The proposed model obtained higher performance than the state-of-the-art methods and can be used to aid radiologists in their diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.