Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36900004›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Attention Deep Feature Extraction from Brain MRIs in Explainable Mode: DGXAINet.

Burak Taşcı

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Burak TaşcıVocational School of Technical Sciences, Firat University, Elazig 23119, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-4490-0946

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence models do not provide information about exactly how the predictions are reached. This lack of transparency is a major drawback. Particularly in medical applications, interest in explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), which helps to develop methods of visualizing, explaining, and analyzing deep learning models, has increased recently. With explainable artificial intelligence, it is possible to understand whether the solutions offered by deep learning techniques are safe. This paper aims to diagnose a fatal disease such as a brain tumor faster and more accurately using XAI methods. In this study, we preferred datasets that are widely used in the literature, such as the four-class kaggle brain tumor dataset (Dataset I) and the three-class figshare brain tumor dataset (Dataset II). To extract features, a pre-trained deep learning model is chosen. DenseNet201 is used as the feature extractor in this case. The proposed automated brain tumor detection model includes five stages. First, training of brain MR images with DenseNet201, the tumor area was segmented with GradCAM. The features were extracted from DenseNet201 trained using the exemplar method. Extracted features were selected with iterative neighborhood component (INCA) feature selector. Finally, the selected features were classified using support vector machine (SVM) with 10-fold cross-validation. An accuracy of 98.65% and 99.97%, were obtained for Datasets I and II, respectively. The proposed model obtained higher performance than the state-of-the-art methods and can be used to aid radiologists in their diagnosis.

Indexed as

brain tumorDensenet201GradCamINCASVMXAI

Identifiers

PMID36900004
PMCPMC10000758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read64
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.