ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Fetal Health Classification from Cardiotocograph for Both Stages of Labor-A Soft-Computing-Based Approach.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precision Unveiled in Unborn: A Cutting-Edge Hybrid Machine Learning Approach for Fetal Health State Classification.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2025Article
- Prediction of Neonatal Length of Stay in High-Risk Pregnancies Using Regression-Based Machine Learning on Computerized Cardiotocography Data.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Automated interpretation of cardiotocography using deep learning in a nationwide multicenter study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Early Detection of Fetal Health Conditions Using Machine Learning for Classifying Imbalanced Cardiotocographic Data.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Fetal Diagnostics using Vision Transformer for Enhanced Health and Severity Prediction in Ultrasound ImagingCurrent medical imaging · 2025Article
- A Fetal Well-Being Diagnostic Method Based on Cardiotocographic Morphological Pattern Utilizing Autoencoder and Recursive Feature Elimination.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Detection of Suspicious Cardiotocographic Recordings by Means of a Machine Learning Classifier.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To date, cardiotocography (CTG) is the only non-invasive and cost-effective tool available for continuous monitoring of the fetal health. In spite of a marked growth in the automation of the CTG analysis, it still remains a challenging signal processing task. Complex and dynamic patterns of fetal heart are poorly interpreted. Particularly, the precise interpretation of the suspected cases is fairly low by both visual and automated methods. Also, the first and second stage of labor produce very different fetal heart rate (FHR) dynamics. Thus, a robust classification model takes both stages into consideration separately. In this work, the authors propose a machine-learning-based model, which was applied separately to both the stages of labor, using standard classifiers such as SVM, random forest (RF), multi-layer perceptron (MLP), and bagging to classify the CTG. The outcome was validated using the model performance measure, combined performance measure, and the ROC-AUC. Though AUC-ROC was sufficiently high for all the classifiers, the other parameters established a better performance by SVM and RF. For suspicious cases the accuracies of SVM and RF were 97.4% and 98%, respectively, whereas sensitivity was 96.4% and specificity was 98% approximately. In the second stage of labor the accuracies were 90.6% and 89.3% for SVM and RF, respectively. Limits of agreement for 95% between the manual annotation and the outcome of SVM and RF were (-0.05 to 0.01) and (-0.03 to 0.02). Henceforth, the proposed classification model is efficient and can be integrated into the automated decision support system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.