ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Oral and Periodontal Risk Factors of Prosthetic Success for 3-Unit Natural Tooth-Supported Bridges versus Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of oral health-related quality of life between resin-bonded and conventional fixed partial dentures.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Assessment of Associations Between Sociodemographic and Analysis of Risk Factors for Oral Infectious Pathology in Patients Scheduled for Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.Clinics and practice · 2025Article
- The Correlations Between Diabetes Mellitus and Oro-Maxillofacial Disorders: A Statistical Perspective.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Treatment Planning for Single-Tooth Implant: A Clinical Guide and Literature Review.Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery · 2025Review
- Endo-Periodontal Lesions in Endodontically Treated Teeth with Periapical Pathology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Histological and Histomorphometric Insights into Implant Bed Preparation: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Influence of Diabetes on Periapical Pathology in Treated and Untreated Teeth: A Cross-Sectional Comparison with Non-Diabetic Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Impact of Infrabony Defects Treatment on Periodontal Markers and Glycated Hemoglobin Using Platelet-Rich Fibrin, Guided Tissue Regeneration, and Access-Flap Surgery.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Assessment of Periodontitis Risk Factors in Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Cross-Sectional Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Impact of Prosthetic Material and Restoration Type on Peri-Implant Bone Resorption: A Retrospective Analysis in a Romanian Sample.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- SEM Evaluation of Marginal Adaptation E-Max Crowns Manufactured by Printing-Pressed and Milling.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Failed Dental Implant: When Titanium Fractures.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Retrospective Case-Control Study Genes Related to Bone Metabolism That Justify the Condition of Periodontal Disease and Failure of Dental Implants in Patients with down Syndrome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Correlations of Peri-Implant Parameters with Plaque and Inflammation Indices in Posterior Fixed Implant-Prosthetic Rehabilitation: A Cross-Sectional Study.Current health sciences journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The goals of this research are: (1) to compare the survival and prosthetic success of metal-ceramic 3-unit tooth- versus implant-supported fixed dental prostheses; (2) to evaluate the influence of several risk factors on the prosthetic success of tooth- and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FPDs). A total of 68 patients with posterior short edentulous spaces (mean age 61.00 ± 1.325 years), were divided into two groups: 3-unit tooth-supported FPDs (40 patients; 52 FPD; mean follow-up 10.27 ± 0.496 years) and 3-unit implant-supported FPDs (28 patients; 32 FPD; mean follow-up 8.656 ± 0.718 years). Pearson-chi tests were used to highlight the risk factors for the prosthetic success of tooth- and implant-supported FPDs and multivariate analysis was used to determine significant risk predictors for the prosthetic success of the tooth-supported FPDs. The survival rates of 3-unit tooth- versus implant-supported FPDs were 100% and 87.5%, respectively, while the prosthetic success was 69.25% and 68.75%, respectively. The prosthetic success of tooth-supported FPDs was significantly higher for patients older than 60 years (83.3%) vs. 40-60 years old (57.1%) (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.