Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36899951›Full record

SynthesisCells2023

The Role of Preservation Solutions upon Saphenous Vein Endothelial Integrity and Function: Systematic Review and UK Practice Survey.

Georgia R Layton, Shameem S Ladak, Riccardo Abbasciano, Liam W McQueen, Sarah J George, Gavin J Murphy, Mustafa Zakkar

Open access · goldFull text readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cells, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The KCa3.1 KCells · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. The Thigh Saphenous Vein Versus the Calf Saphenous Vein: Searching for the Optimal Conduit for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Georgia R LaytonDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2209-0559
Shameem S LadakDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.
Riccardo AbbascianoDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Imperial College London, London SW7 2BX, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6004-8741
Liam W McQueenDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8755-3473
Sarah J GeorgeDepartment of Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol BS2 1UDD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1426-8257
Gavin J MurphyDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.
Mustafa ZakkarDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.
University of Leicester · GBImperial College London · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation AA/18/3/34220British Heart Foundation CH/12/1/29419
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The long saphenous vein is the most used conduit in cardiac surgery, but its long-term patency is limited by vein graft disease (VGD). Endothelial dysfunction is a key driver of VGD; its aetiology is multi-factorial. However emerging evidence identifies vein conduit harvest technique and preservation fluids as causal in their onset and propagation. This study aims to comprehensively review published data on the relationship between preservation solutions, endothelial cell integrity and function, and VGD in human saphenous veins harvested for CABG. The review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022358828). Electronic searches of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases were undertaken from inception until August 2022. Papers were evaluated in line with registered inclusion and exclusion criteria. Searches identified 13 prospective, controlled studies for inclusion in the analysis. All studies used saline as a control solution. Intervention solutions included heparinised whole blood and saline, DuraGraft, TiProtec, EuroCollins, University of Wisconsin (UoW), buffered, cardioplegic and Pyruvate solutions. Most studies demonstrated that normal saline appears to have negative effects on venous endothelium and the most effective preservation solutions identified in this review were TiProtec and DuraGraft. The most used preservation solutions in the UK are heparinised saline or autologous whole blood. There is substantial heterogeneity both in practice and reporting of trials evaluating vein graft preservation solutions, and the quality of existing evidence is low. There is an unmet need for high quality trials evaluating the potential for these interventions to improve long-term patency in venous bypass grafts.

Indexed as

Organ Preservation SolutionsVascular DiseasesEndothelium, VascularHumansProspective StudiesSaphenous VeinUnited KingdomOrgan Preservation Solutionscoronary artery bypass graftingvein graft diseasevenous endothelium

Identifiers

PMID36899951
PMCPMC10001248
OpenAlexW4323312794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read45
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.