Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36899932›Full record

ReviewCells2023

No Time to Die-How Islets Meet Their Demise in Transplantation.

Atharva Kale, Natasha M Rogers

Open access · goldFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Engineering hypoimmune stem cell-derived beta cells.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025
    Review
  6. Exendin-4 enhances insulin-positive phenotype of human pluripotent stem cell-derived β cells during transplantation.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Atharva KaleCentre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2665-5836
Natasha M RogersCentre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Islet transplantation represents an effective treatment for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and severe hypoglycaemia unawareness, capable of circumventing impaired counterregulatory pathways that no longer provide protection against low blood glucose levels. The additional beneficial effect of normalizing metabolic glycaemic control is the minimisation of further complications related to T1DM and insulin administration. However, patients require allogeneic islets from up to three donors, and the long-term insulin independence is inferior to that achieved with solid organ (whole pancreas) transplantation. This is likely due to the fragility of islets caused by the isolation process, innate immune responses following portal infusion, auto- and allo-immune-mediated destruction and β-cell exhaustion following transplantation. This review covers the specific challenges related to islet vulnerability and dysfunction that affect long-term cell survival following transplantation.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1HypoglycemiaInsulin-Secreting CellsIslets of Langerhans TransplantationHumansInsulinTransplantation, HomologousInsulinbeta cellsER stressIBMIRislet transplantationrejection

Identifiers

PMID36899932
PMCPMC10000424
OpenAlexW4323318874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read7
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.