Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36899429›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2023

Laboratory evaluation of the efficacy of deltamethrin-laced attractive toxic sugar bait formulation on Anopheles stephensi.

Sarita Kumar, Aarti Sharma, Roopa Rani Samal, Manoj Kumar, Vaishali Verma, Ravinder Kumar Sagar, Shri Pati Singh, Kamaraju Raghavendra

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarita KumarDepartment of Zoology, Acharya Narendra Dev College, University of Delhi, Kalkaji, New Delhi, 110 019, India. saritakumar@andc.du.ac.in.
Aarti SharmaDepartment of Zoology, Acharya Narendra Dev College, University of Delhi, Kalkaji, New Delhi, 110 019, India.
Roopa Rani SamalDepartment of Zoology, Acharya Narendra Dev College, University of Delhi, Kalkaji, New Delhi, 110 019, India.
Manoj KumarDepartment of Zoology, Acharya Narendra Dev College, University of Delhi, Kalkaji, New Delhi, 110 019, India.
Vaishali VermaICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, Sector 8, Dwarka, New Delhi, 110 077, India.
Ravinder Kumar SagarDepartment of Zoology, Acharya Narendra Dev College, University of Delhi, Kalkaji, New Delhi, 110 019, India.
Shri Pati SinghICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, Sector 8, Dwarka, New Delhi, 110 077, India.
Kamaraju RaghavendraICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, Sector 8, Dwarka, New Delhi, 110 077, India.
University of Delhi · INNational Institute of Malaria Research · IN

Funding

Indian Council of Medical Research-MERA India MERA/3/2020-ECD-II
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAttractive toxic sugar bait (ATSB) is a promising "attract and kill"-based approach for mosquito control. It is a combination of flower nectar/fruit juice to attract the mosquitoes, sugar solution to stimulate feeding, and a toxin to kill them. Selecting an effective attractant and optimizing concentration of toxicant is significant in the formulation of ATSB.

methodsCurrent study formulated an ATSB using fruit juice, sugar and deltamethrin, a synthetic pyrethroid. It was evaluated against two laboratory strains of Anopheles stephensi. Initial studies evaluated comparative attractiveness of nine different fruit juices to An. stephensi adults. Nine ASBs were prepared by adding fermented juices of plum, guava, sweet lemon, orange, mango, pineapple, muskmelon, papaya, and watermelon with 10% sucrose solution (w/v) in 1:1 ratio. Cage bioassays were conducted to assess relative attraction potential of ASBs based on the number of mosquito landings on each and the most effective ASB was identified. Ten ATSBs were prepared by adding the identified ASB with different deltamethrin concentrations (0.015625-8.0 mg/10 mL) in 1:9 ratio. Each ATSB was assessed for the toxic potential against both the strains of An. stephensi. The data was statistically analysed using PASW (SPSS) software 19.0 program.

resultsThe cage bioassays with nine ASBs revealed higher efficacy (p < 0.05) of Guava juice-ASB > Plum juice-ASB > Mango juice-ASB in comparison to rest of the six ASB's. The bioassay with these three ASB's ascertained the highest attractancy potential of guava juice-ASB against both the strains of An. stephensi. The ATSB formulations resulted in 5.1-97.9% mortality in Sonepat (NIMR strain) with calculated LC

conclusionThe ATSB formulated with guava juice-ASB and deltamethrin (0.0015625-0.8%) in 9:1 ratio showed promising results against two laboratory strains of An. stephensi. Field assessment of these formulations is being conducted to estimate their feasibility for use in mosquito control.

Indexed as

AnophelesInsecticidesPyrethrinsAnimalsCarbohydratesMosquito ControlNitrilesSugarsCarbohydratesdecamethrinInsecticidesNitrilesPyrethrinsSugarsAnopheles stephensiAttractive toxic sugar bait (ATSB)Cage bioassayDeltamethrinFruit juice

Identifiers

PMID36899429
PMCPMC10007731
OpenAlexW4323817456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read1
measurements read151
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.