Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36899408›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2023

Improving the quality of publications in and advancing the paradigms of clinical and social pharmacy practice research: The Granada statements.

Fernando Fernandez-Llimos, Shane Desselle, Derek Stewart, Victoria Garcia-Cardenas, Zaheer-Ud-Din Babar, Christine Bond, Ana Dago, Ramune Jacobsen, Lotte Stig Nørgaard, Carlo Polidori and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The importance of rigor in pharmacy research: Challenges and solutions.Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Considerations for conducting a scoping review in pharmacy education.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Fernando Fernandez-LlimosRevista Brasileira de Farmacia Hospitalar e Serviços de Saude, Professor, Laboratory of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8529-9595
Shane DesselleResearch in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy, Research and Professional Affairs, Touro University California, Vallejo, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5987-1391
Derek StewartInternational Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, Professor of Clinical Pharmacy and Practice, College of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7360-8592
Victoria Garcia-CardenasResearch in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, Senior Lecturer, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3770-4557
Zaheer-Ud-Din BabarJournal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice, Professor in Medicines and Healthcare, Department of Pharmacy, School of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK. z.babar@hud.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1051-3240
Christine BondInternational Journal of Pharmacy Practice, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0429-5208
Ana DagoPharmaceutical Care España, Pharmaceutical Care España Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5751-0202
Ramune JacobsenExploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy, Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacy, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8142-9807
Lotte Stig NørgaardResearch in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacy, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3490-0475
Carlo PolidoriEuropean Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, Associate Professor, Department of Experimental Medicine and Public Health, University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6946-8638
Manuel Sanchez-PoloArs Pharmaceutica, Professor, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7802-6505
Bernardo Santos-RamosFarmacia Hospitalaria, Department of Pharmacy, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBIS), Seville, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4315-351X
Natalia ShcherbakovaResearch in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, Associate Professor, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Western New England University, Springfield, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3337-3404
Fernanda ToninResearcher, Pharmacy Practice. Health and Technology Research Center (H&TRC), Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde (ESTeSL), Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4262-8608

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmacy and pharmaceutical sciences embrace a series of different disciplines. Pharmacy practice has been defined as "the scientific discipline that studies the different aspects of the practice of pharmacy and its impact on health care systems, medicine use, and patient care". Thus, pharmacy practice studies embrace both clinical pharmacy and social pharmacy elements. Like any other scientific discipline, clinical and social pharmacy practice disseminates research findings using scientific journals. Clinical pharmacy and social pharmacy journal editors have a role in promoting the discipline by enhancing the quality of the articles published. As has occurred in other health care areas (i.e., medicine and nursing), a group of clinical and social pharmacy practice journal editors gathered in Granada, Spain to discuss how journals could contribute to strengthening pharmacy practice as a discipline. The result of that meeting was compiled in these Granada Statements, which comprise 18 recommendations gathered into six topics: the appropriate use of terminology, impactful abstracts, the required peer reviews, journal scattering, more effective and wiser use of journal and article performance metrics, and authors' selection of the most appropriate pharmacy practice journal to submit their work.

Indexed as

Clinical PharmacyGranada StatementsPharmacy PracticePublicationsResearchSocial Pharmacy

Identifiers

PMID36899408
PMCPMC9999617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.