ReviewPediatric radiology2023
SPECT/CT, PET/CT and PET/MRI: oncologic and infectious applications and protocol considerations.
Review in Pediatric radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gold Nanoparticles in Atherosclerosis: A Dual Approach to Diagnosis and Therapy.Molecular imaging and biology · 2025Review
- Radiolabeled Nanogels: From Multimodality Imaging to Combination Therapy of Cancer.Small science · 2025Review
- Will PET/MR Imaging Replace PET/CT for Pediatric Applications?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Development of NovelACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025Article
- Noninvasive in vivo imaging of macrophages: understanding tumor microenvironments and delivery of therapeutics.Biomarker research · 2025Review
- AI-based automatic patient positioning in a digital-BGO PET/CT scanner: efficacy and impact.EJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- Radiopharmaceuticals and their applications in medicine.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- Antibody-drug conjugates targeting the cadherin, claudin and nectin families of adhesion molecules.Frontiers in molecular medicine · 2025Review
- An extended bore length solid-state digital-BGO PET/CT system: design, preliminary experience, and performance characteristics.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
- Paediatric radiotherapy in the United Kingdom: an evolving subspecialty and a paradigm for integrated teamworking in oncology.The British journal of radiology · 2024Article
- X-ray fluoroscopy guided localization and steering of miniature robots using virtual reality enhancement.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Functional imaging is playing an increasingly important role in pediatric radiology. Hybrid imaging techniques utilizing PET/CT (positron emission tomography/computed tomography), PET/MRI (positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging), or SPECT/CT (single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography) are now available in nearly every clinical practice. There are an increasing number of indications for the use of functional imaging, including oncologic and infectious indications, and it is essential to select and design the hybrid imaging protocol in order to optimize both the functional and anatomic components of the examination. Optimizing the protocol includes strategies for dose reduction, judicious use of contrast media and diagnostic quality imaging as appropriate, and for the greatest reduction in exposure to ionizing radiation, utilizing PET/MRI, whenever available. This review will provide an overview of hybrid imaging protocol considerations with a focus on oncologic and infectious indications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36899268What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.