ArticleScientific reports2023
A novel non-slip banded balloon catheter for endoscopic sphincteroplasty: an ex vivo and in vivo pilot study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of Minimal Endoscopic Sphincterotomy with Balloon Dilation and Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for the Treatment of Small Common Bile Duct Stones: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- A Novel Non-slip Balloon Catheter for Papillary Dilatation: Toward Safer and Simpler Bile Duct Stone Removal.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- A novel nonslip short-length balloon catheter for endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation.Endoscopy · 2025Article
- Article
- Minimal Endoscopic Sphincterotomy with Papillary Balloon Dilation Using a Novel Non-slip Balloon Catheter for the Treatment of Common Bile Duct Stones: A Prospective Pilot Study.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic balloon sphincteroplasty is an established procedure for the extraction of bile duct stones. However, the balloon often slips during the inflation process, and its length is an impediment if the distance between the papilla and scope is limited and/or the stone is located close to the papilla. This animal experimental study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a novel short non-slip banded balloon measuring 15-20 mm in length for sphincteroplasty. The ex vivo component of this study was conducted using porcine duodenal papilla. Miniature pigs were subjected to endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the in vivo component. The technical success of sphincteroplasty without any slippage was the primary outcome of the study and was compared between cases managed with the non-slip banded balloon (non-slip balloon group) and conventional balloon (conventional balloon group). The technical success rate of the ex vivo component, i.e., absence of any slippage, was significantly higher in the non-slip balloon group than in the conventional balloon group with the 8-mm (96.0% vs. 16.0%, P < 0.001) and 12-mm diameter balloons (96.0% vs. 0%, P < 0.001). The technical success rate of endoscopic sphincteroplasty without slippage in the in vivo component was significantly higher in the non-slip balloon group than in the conventional balloon group (100% vs. 40%, P = 0.011). No immediate adverse events were observed in either group. The slippage rate was significantly lower with sphincteroplasty using a non-slip balloon, despite the balloon length being considerably shorter than that of conventional balloons, demonstrating its potential utility in difficult cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.