ArticleHeart (British Cardiac Society)2023
Expert consensus recommendations for the provision of infective endocarditis services: updated guidance from the Joint British Societies.
Article in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Microorganisms and Mortality Factors in Hospitalized Hemodialysis Patients with Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection and Infective Endocarditis: 7 Years of Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Management of infective endocarditis in a secondary care trust: a service evaluation of treatment outcomes and multidisciplinary involvement.Access microbiology · 2026Article
- Nomogram for predicting mortality in hospitalized patients with infective endocarditis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The role of multimodal imaging in the diagnosis of prosthetic valve and intracardiac device endocarditis: A review.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Review
- Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis of Infective Endocarditis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infective endocarditis (IE) remains a difficult condition to diagnose and treat and is an infection of high consequence for patients, causing long hospital stays, life-changing complications and high mortality. A new multidisciplinary, multiprofessional, British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC)-ledWorking Party was convened to undertake a focused systematical review of the literature and to update the previous BSAC guidelines relating delivery of services for patients with IE. A scoping exercise identified new questions concerning optimal delivery of care, and the systematic review identified 16 231 papers of which 20 met the inclusion criteria. Recommendations relating to endocarditis teams, infrastructure and support, endocarditis referral processes, patient follow-up and patient information, and governance are made as well as research recommendations. This is a report of a joint Working Party of the BSAC, British Cardiovascular Society, British Heart Valve Society, British Society of Echocardiography, Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, British Congenital Cardiac Association and British Infection Association.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.