Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36897939›Full record

ArticleScience advances2023

High-throughput genetic engineering of nonmodel and undomesticated bacteria via iterative site-specific genome integration.

Joshua R Elmore, Gara N Dexter, Henri Baldino, Jay D Huenemann, Ryan Francis, George L Peabody, Jessica Martinez-Baird, Lauren A Riley, Tuesday Simmons, Devin Coleman-Derr and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
13.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. EngineeringMetabolic engineering communications · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Multi-layered metabolic remodeling ofMetabolic engineering communications · 2026
    Article
  13. Multi-Targeting Non-Specific Genome Engineering in Bacteria.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Genome announcement of sulfate-reducingMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Joshua R ElmoreBiological Science Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4750-9640
Gara N DexterBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, One Bethel Valley Road, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1690-5723
Henri BaldinoBiological Science Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7159-3075
Jay D HuenemannBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, One Bethel Valley Road, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0776-8664
Ryan FrancisBiological Science Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3964-6090
George L PeabodyBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, One Bethel Valley Road, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6761-8575
Jessica Martinez-BairdBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, One Bethel Valley Road, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4656-7793
Lauren A RileyBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, One Bethel Valley Road, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA.
Tuesday SimmonsPlant and Microbial Biology Department, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94701, USA.
Devin Coleman-DerrPlant and Microbial Biology Department, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94701, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6282-1731
Adam M GussBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, One Bethel Valley Road, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5823-5329
Robert G EgbertBiological Science Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9470-7124
Oak Ridge National Laboratory · USPacific Northwest National Laboratory · USPlant Gene Expression Center · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient genome engineering is critical to understand and use microbial functions. Despite recent development of tools such as CRISPR-Cas gene editing, efficient integration of exogenous DNA with well-characterized functions remains limited to model bacteria. Here, we describe serine recombinase-assisted genome engineering, or SAGE, an easy-to-use, highly efficient, and extensible technology that enables selection marker-free, site-specific genome integration of up to 10 DNA constructs, often with efficiency on par with or superior to replicating plasmids. SAGE uses no replicating plasmids and thus lacks the host range limitations of other genome engineering technologies. We demonstrate the value of SAGE by characterizing genome integration efficiency in five bacteria that span multiple taxonomy groups and biotechnology applications and by identifying more than 95 heterologous promoters in each host with consistent transcription across environmental and genetic contexts. We anticipate that SAGE will rapidly expand the number of industrial and environmental bacteria compatible with high-throughput genetics and synthetic biology.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGenetic EngineeringBacteriaDNAGene EditingDNA

Identifiers

PMID36897939
PMCPMC10005180
OpenAlexW4323920788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.