ArticlePloS one2023
Detection of Hepatitis C virus RNA using a novel hybridization chain reaction method that competitively dampens cascade amplification.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Current advances in Hepatitis C diagnostics.Journal of biological engineering · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The hybridization chain reaction (HCR) is widely used for biosensing. However, HCR does not provide the required sensitivity. In this study, we reported a method to improve the sensitivity of HCR by dampening the cascade amplification. First, we designed a biosensor based on HCR, and an initiator DNA was used to trigger the cascade amplification. Optimization of the reaction was then performed, and the results showed that the limit of detection (LOD) for the initiator DNA was about 2.5 nM. Second, we designed a series of inhibitory DNAs to dampen the HCR cascade amplification, and DNA dampeners (50 nM) were applied in the presence of the DNA initiator (50 nM). One of the DNA dampeners (D5) showed the best inhibitory efficiency of greater than 80%. This was further applied at concentrations ranging from 0 nM to 10 nM to prohibit the HCR amplification caused by a 2.5 nM initiator DNA (the limit of detection for this initiator DNA). The results showed that 0.156 nM of D5 could significantly inhibit the signal amplification (p<0.05). Additionally, the limit of detection for the dampener D5 was 16 times lower than that for the initiator DNA. Based on this detection method, we achieved a detection limit as low as 0.625 nM for HCV-RNAs. In summary, we developed a novel method with improved sensitivity to detect the target designed to prohibit the HCR cascade. Overall, this method could be used to qualitatively detect the presence of single-stranded DNA/RNA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.