ArticlePLoS computational biology2023
G4mismatch: Deep neural networks to predict G-quadruplex propensity based on G4-seq data.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- AGAPE (Computational G‑Quadruplex Stabilization Prediction): The First Machine Learning Workflow for G‑Quadruplex Stabilization Prediction.ACS omega · 2026Article
- G4mer: An RNA language model for transcriptome-wide identification of G-quadruplexes and disease variants from population-scale genetic data.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Overview and Prospects of DNA Sequence Visualization.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Machine learning-based prediction of DNA G-quadruplex folding topology with G4ShapePredictor.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Genome-wide mapping of G-quadruplex DNA: a step-by-step guide to select the most effective method.RSC chemical biology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
G-quadruplexes are non-B-DNA structures that form in the genome facilitated by Hoogsteen bonds between guanines in single or multiple strands of DNA. The functions of G-quadruplexes are linked to various molecular and disease phenotypes, and thus researchers are interested in measuring G-quadruplex formation genome-wide. Experimentally measuring G-quadruplexes is a long and laborious process. Computational prediction of G-quadruplex propensity from a given DNA sequence is thus a long-standing challenge. Unfortunately, despite the availability of high-throughput datasets measuring G-quadruplex propensity in the form of mismatch scores, extant methods to predict G-quadruplex formation either rely on small datasets or are based on domain-knowledge rules. We developed G4mismatch, a novel algorithm to accurately and efficiently predict G-quadruplex propensity for any genomic sequence. G4mismatch is based on a convolutional neural network trained on almost 400 millions human genomic loci measured in a single G4-seq experiment. When tested on sequences from a held-out chromosome, G4mismatch, the first method to predict mismatch scores genome-wide, achieved a Pearson correlation of over 0.8. When benchmarked on independent datasets derived from various animal species, G4mismatch trained on human data predicted G-quadruplex propensity genome-wide with high accuracy (Pearson correlations greater than 0.7). Moreover, when tested in detecting G-quadruplexes genome-wide using the predicted mismatch scores, G4mismatch achieved superior performance compared to extant methods. Last, we demonstrate the ability to deduce the mechanism behind G-quadruplex formation by unique visualization of the principles learned by the model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.