Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36897853›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Impact of enhancing GP access to diagnostic imaging: A scoping review.

Amy Phelan, John Broughan, Geoff McCombe, Claire Collins, Ronan Fawsitt, Mike O'Callaghan, Diarmuid Quinlan, Fintan Stanley, Walter Cullen

Open access · goldFull text readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Amy PhelanSchool of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
John BroughanClinical Research Centre, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-5084-8507
Geoff McCombeSchool of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Claire CollinsResearch, Policy and Information, Irish College of General Practitioners, Dublin, Ireland.
Ronan FawsittGeneral Practice, Castle Gardens Medical Centre, Kilkenny, Ireland.
Mike O'CallaghanIrish College of General Practitioners, ICGP, Dublin, Ireland.
Diarmuid QuinlanIrish College of General Practitioners, ICGP, Dublin, Ireland.
Fintan StanleyIrish College of General Practitioners, ICGP, Dublin, Ireland.
Walter CullenSchool of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
University College Dublin · IESt. Luke's General Hospital · IEUniversity of Limerick · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDirect access to diagnostic imaging in General Practice provides an avenue to reduce referrals to hospital-based specialities and emergency departments, and to ensure timely diagnosis. Enhanced GP access to radiology imaging could potentially reduce hospital referrals, hospital admissions, enhance patient care, and improve disease outcomes. This scoping review aims to demonstrate the value of direct access to diagnostic imaging in General Practice and how it has impacted on healthcare delivery and patient care.

methodsA search was conducted of 'PubMed', 'Cochrane Library', 'Embase' and 'Google Scholar' for papers published between 2012-2022 using Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review framework. The search process was guided by the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews checklist (PRISMA-ScR).

resultsTwenty-three papers were included. The studies spanned numerous geographical locations (most commonly UK, Denmark, and Netherlands), encompassing several study designs (most commonly cohort studies, randomised controlled trials and observational studies), and a range of populations and sample sizes. Key outcomes reported included the level of access to imaging serves, the feasibility and cost effectiveness of direct access interventions, GP and patient satisfaction with direct access initiatives, and intervention related scan waiting times and referral process.

conclusionDirect access to imaging for GPs can have many benefits for healthcare service delivery, patient care, and the wider healthcare ecosystem. GP focused direct access initiatives should therefore be considered as a desirable and viable health policy directive. Further research is needed to more closely examine the impacts that access to imaging studies have on health system operations, especially those in General Practice. Research examining the impacts of access to multiple imaging modalities is also warranted.

Indexed as

EcosystemGeneral PracticeCohort StudiesHospitalizationHumansRadiographyRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID36897853
PMCPMC10004541
OpenAlexW4323810316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read9
reference markers read25
identifiers read5
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.