ArticleJMIR formative research2023
Implementing an Activity Tracker to Increase Motivation for Physical Activity in Patients With Diabetes in Primary Care: Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) Analysis.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03709966 (Using a Portable Monitoring Device to Increase Motivation for Physical Activity in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Using a Portable Monitoring Device to Increase Motivation for Physical Activity in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- General practitioners` experiences promoting digital activity tracking for patients with type 2 diabetes: a focus group study.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Nursing care for individuals with Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease from the perspective of a nursing model and nurses: a case study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- The use of implementation science theoretical approaches in hybrid effectiveness-implementation type 1 randomised trials of healthcare interventions: A scoping review.Implementation science : IS · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of a Lifestyle Improvement Support App in Combination with a Wearable Device in Japanese People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: STEP-DM Study.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMany projects related to technology implementation in the context of chronic diseases have been developed over the years to better manage lifestyle medicine interventions and improve patient care. However, technology implementation in primary care settings remains challenging.
objectiveThe aim is to carry out a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis (1) to assess satisfaction among patients with type 2 diabetes using an activity tracker to increase motivation for physical activity (PA) and (2) to explore the research and health care team's perceptions of this technology's implementation in a primary care setting.
methodsA 3-month hybrid type 1 study, which included 2 stages, was conducted in an academic primary health center in Quebec City, Quebec, Canada. In stage 1, a total of 30 patients with type 2 diabetes were randomized to the intervention (activity tracker) group or the control group. In stage 2, a SWOT analysis was performed on both patients and health care professionals to determine the components of successful technology implementation. Two questionnaires were used to gather feedback: a satisfaction and acceptability questionnaire concerning an activity tracker (15 patients in the intervention group) and a questionnaire based on the SWOT elements (15 patients in the intervention group and 7 health care professionals). Both questionnaires contained quantitative and qualitative questions. Qualitative variables from open questions were synthesized in a matrix and ranked according to apparition frequency and global importance. A thematic analysis was performed by the first author and validated by 2 coauthors separately. The information gathered was triangulated to propose recommendations that were then approved by the team. Both quantitative (randomized controlled trial participants) and qualitative (randomized controlled trial participants and team) results were combined for recommendations.
resultsIn total, 86% (12/14) of the participants were satisfied with their activity tracker use and 75% (9/12) felt that it incited them to stick to their PA program. The main strengths of the team members' perspectives were the project initiation and involvement of a patient partner, the study design, the team, and the device. The weaknesses were the budgetary constraints, the turnover, and the technical issues. The opportunities were the primary care setting, the loan of equipment, and common technology. The threats were recruitment issues, administrative challenges, technological difficulties, and a single research site.
conclusionsPatients with type 2 diabetes were satisfied with their activity tracker used to improve motivation for PA. Health care team members agreed that implementation can be done in primary care, but some challenges remain in using this technological tool in clinical practice regularly.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03709966; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03709966.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.