Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36897592›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2023

Effect of Financial Incentives and Default Options on Food Choices of Adults With Low Income in Online Retail Settings: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Pasquale E Rummo, Christina A Roberto, Lorna E Thorpe, Andrea B Troxel, Brian Elbel

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04766034 (Impact of Behavioral Economic Strategies on Low-Income Older Adults' Food Choices in Online Retail Settings), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04766034 nacompletednot on this map

Impact of Behavioral Economic Strategies on Low-Income Older Adults' Food Choices in Online Retail Settings

TypeinterventionalSponsorNYU Langone HealthRan2021 to 2021Enrolled7,710ConditionsDiet HabitArmsSimulated Grocery Shopping Exercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Promoting healthy behaviour with financial incentives: three challenges and solutions for large scale implementation.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pasquale E RummoDepartment of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York.
Christina A RobertoPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Lorna E ThorpeDepartment of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York.
Andrea B TroxelDepartment of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York.
Brian ElbelDepartment of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York.

Funding

Impact of Online Ordering on Low-Income Adults’ Food Security in Online Food Pantry SettingsK01AG064146 · NIA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI RUMMO, PASQUALE · 2020 to 2024
$677k
NIA NIH HHS K01 AG064146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Despite recent growth in online redemption of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, no previous work has tested the impact of economic and behavioral economic strategies on food purchasing behaviors in an online grocery retail setting among adults with low income. Objective: To examine the extent to which financial incentives and default shopping cart options influence fruit and vegetable purchases. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial used an experimental online grocery store for adults who currently or have ever received SNAP benefits. From October 7 to December 2, 2021, participants were instructed to shop for a week's worth of groceries for their household, with a budget tailored to household size; no payment was taken. Interventions: Random assignment to 1 of 4 conditions: no intervention, 50% discount on eligible fruits and vegetables, prefilled shopping carts with tailored fruit and vegetable items (ie, default options), or a combination of the discount and default options. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the percentage of nondiscounted dollars spent on eligible fruit and vegetables per basket. Results: Of 2744 participants, mean (SD) age was 46.7 (16.0) years, and 1447 (52.7%) identified as women. A total of 1842 participants (67.1%) reported currently receiving SNAP benefits and 1492 (54.4%) reported shopping online for groceries in the previous 12 months. Participants spent a mean (SD) 20.5% (23.5%) of total dollars on eligible fruits and vegetables. Compared with no intervention, those in the discount condition spent 4.7% (98.3% CI, 1.7%-7.7%) of more total dollars on eligible fruits and vegetables; those in the default condition, 7.8% (98.3% CI, 4.8%-10.7%) more; and those in the combination condition, 13.0% (98.3% CI, 10.0%-16.0%) more (P < .001 for all). There was no difference between the discount and the default conditions (P = .06), but the effect in the combination condition was significantly larger than both discount and default conditions (P < .001). Default shopping cart items were purchased by 679 participants (93.4%) in the default condition and 655 (95.5%) in the combination condition, whereas 297 (45.8%) in the control and 361 (52.9%) in the discount conditions purchased those items (P < .001). No variation was observed by age, sex, or race and ethnicity, and results were similar when those who reported never shopping online for groceries were excluded. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, financial incentives for fruits and vegetables and default options, especially in combination, led to meaningful increases in online fruit and vegetable purchases among adults with low income. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04766034.

Indexed as

MotivationVegetablesAdultFamily CharacteristicsFemaleFruitHumansMiddle AgedPoverty

Identifiers

PMID36897592
PMCPMC10789116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.