Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36897582›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2023

Association of Primary Care Visit Length With Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing.

Hannah T Neprash, John F Mulcahy, Dori A Cross, Joseph E Gaugler, Ezra Golberstein, Ishani Ganguli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
30.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Impact of Emerging Technologies on Outpatient Care Quality: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hannah T NeprashDivision of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
John F MulcahyDivision of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Dori A CrossDivision of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Joseph E GauglerDivision of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Ezra GolbersteinDivision of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Ishani GanguliHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
University of Minnesota · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

Life Course Center Program Development CoreP30AG066613 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Sarah M Flood · 2020 to 2026
$5.0M
Minnesota Population Center Science and Technical CoreP2CHD041023 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI THERESA LOUISE OSYPUK · 2016 to 2026
$4.3M
The Role of Virtual Care in Improving Primary Care Access and Continuity for At-Risk Multimorbid Older AdultsK23AG068240 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI GANGULI, ISHANI · 2021 to 2025
$842k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG068240NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066613NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Time is a valuable resource in primary care, and physicians and patients consistently raise concerns about inadequate time during visits. However, there is little evidence on whether shorter visits translate into lower-quality care. Objective: To investigate variations in primary care visit length and quantify the association between visit length and potentially inappropriate prescribing decisions by primary care physicians. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used data from electronic health record systems in primary care offices across the US to analyze adult primary care visits occurring in calendar year 2017. Analysis was conducted from March 2022 through January 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: Regression analyses quantified the association between patient visit characteristics and visit length (measured using time stamp data) and the association between visit length and potentially inappropriate prescribing decisions, including inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions for upper respiratory tract infections, coprescribing of opioids and benzodiazepines for painful conditions, and prescriptions that were potentially inappropriate for older adults (based on the Beers criteria). All rates were estimated using physician fixed effects and were adjusted for patient and visit characteristics. Results: This study included 8 119 161 primary care visits by 4 360 445 patients (56.6% women) with 8091 primary care physicians; 7.7% of patients were Hispanic, 10.4% were non-Hispanic Black, 68.2% were non-Hispanic White, 5.5% were other race and ethnicity, and 8.3% had missing race and ethnicity. Longer visits were more complex (ie, more diagnoses recorded and/or more chronic conditions coded). After controlling for scheduled visit duration and measures of visit complexity, younger, publicly insured, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic Black patients had shorter visits. For each additional minute of visit length, the likelihood that a visit resulted in an inappropriate antibiotic prescription changed by -0.11 percentage points (95% CI, -0.14 to -0.09 percentage points) and the likelihood of opioid and benzodiazepine coprescribing changed by -0.01 percentage points (95% CI, -0.01 to -0.009 percentage points). Visit length had a positive association with potentially inappropriate prescribing among older adults (0.004 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.003-0.006 percentage points). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, shorter visit length was associated with a higher likelihood of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for patients with upper respiratory tract infections and coprescribing of opioids and benzodiazepines for patients with painful conditions. These findings suggest opportunities for additional research and operational improvements to visit scheduling and quality of prescribing decisions in primary care.

Indexed as

Nose DiseasesRespiratory Tract InfectionsAgedAnalgesics, OpioidAnti-Bacterial AgentsBenzodiazepinesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInappropriate PrescribingMalePractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareAnalgesics, OpioidAnti-Bacterial AgentsBenzodiazepines

Identifiers

PMID36897582
PMCPMC10249052
OpenAlexW4323810989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.