Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36897534›Full record

SynthesisCurrent urology reports2023

An Update of In Vivo Application of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics for Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy: Results from a Systematic Review.

Vineet Gauhar, Carlo Giulioni, Nariman Gadzhiev, Virgilio De Stefano, Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh, Ho Yee Tiong, Kazumi Taguchi, Giulio Milanese, Andrea Benedetto Galosi, Bhaskar Kumar Somani and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current urology reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. New Technology in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Application of Navigation System, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, and Suction Access Sheath.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Vineet GauharDepartment of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Carlo GiulioniUrology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60127, Ancona, Italy.
Nariman GadzhievDepartment of Urology, Saint-Petersburg State University Hospital, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Virgilio De StefanoDepartment of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Jeremy Yuen-Chun TeohS.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Ho Yee TiongDepartment of Urology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Kazumi TaguchiDepartment of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan.
Giulio MilaneseDepartment of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Andrea Benedetto GalosiDepartment of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Bhaskar Kumar SomaniDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
Daniele CastellaniDepartment of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore. castellanidaniele@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7354-9190

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewKidney puncture is a key step in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Ultrasound/fluoroscopic-guided access to the collecting systems is commonly used in PCNL. Performing a puncture is often challenging in kidneys with congenital malformations or complex staghorn stones. We aim to perform a systematic review to examine data on in vivo applications, outcomes, and limitations of using artificial intelligence and robotics for access in PCNL. RECENT

findingsThe literature search was performed on November 2, 2022, using Embase, PubMed, and Google Scholar. Twelve studies were included. 3D in PCNL is useful for image reconstruction but also in 3D printing with definite benefits seen in improving anatomical spatial understanding for preoperative and intraoperative planning. 3D model printing and virtual and mixed reality allow for an enhanced training experience and easier access which seems to translate into a shorter learning curve and better stone-free rate compared to standard puncture. Robotic access improves the accuracy of the puncture for ultrasound- and fluoroscopic-guided access in both supine and prone positions. The potential advantage robotics are using artificial intelligence to do remote access, reduced number of needle punctures, and less radiation exposure during renal access. Artificial intelligence, virtual and mixed reality, and robotics may play a key role in improving PCNL surgery by enhancing all aspects of a successful intervention from entry to exit. There is a gradual adoption of this newer technology into clinical practice but is yet limited to centers with access and the ability to afford this.

Indexed as

LithotripsyNephrolithotomy, PercutaneousArtificial IntelligenceHumansNephrostomy, PercutaneousRoboticsArtificial intelligenceKidney calculiPercutaneous nephrolithotomyRoboticsThree-dimensionalVirtual reality

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.