Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36897482›Full record

ArticleJournal of youth and adolescence2023

Not Next to You: Peer Rejection, Sociodemographic Characteristics and the Moderating Effects of Classroom Composition.

Simon Hjalmarsson, Peter Fallesen, Stephanie Plenty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of youth and adolescence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Simon HjalmarssonThe Swedish Institute for Social Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden. simon.hjalmarsson@sofi.su.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8036-2997
Peter FallesenThe Swedish Institute for Social Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Stephanie PlentyThe Swedish Institute for Social Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While a range of sociodemographic characteristics are associated with a greater risk of peer rejection at school, it is currently unclear how key theoretical frameworks explaining rejection apply to such characteristics. This study examines how migration background, gender, household income, parental education and cognitive ability are linked to peer rejection. Building on person-group dissimilarity and social identity theory, the study assesses the moderating role of classroom composition and the extent to which students reject classmates who differ to themselves (i.e., outgroup derogation). Data is drawn from a nationally representative sample of 4215 Swedish eighth grade students (M

Indexed as

Emigrants and ImmigrantsPeer GroupAdolescentFemaleHumansInfantMaleSchoolsSocial IdentificationStudents

Identifiers

PMID36897482
PMCPMC10121533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.