Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36897465›Full record

Trial reportBreast cancer research and treatment2023

Using Oncotype DX breast recurrence score® assay to define the role of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

Caitlin Taylor, Jane Meisel, Aimee J Foreman, Christy Russell, Dipankar Bandyopadhyay, Xiaoyan Deng, Lisa Floyd, Amelia Zelnak, Harry Bear, Ruth O'Regan

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Patient outcomes and clinician perspectives following one year ofTranslational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Caitlin TaylorOchsner Cancer Institute, New Orleans, LA, USA. caitlin.e.taylor@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6672-1167
Jane MeiselEmory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Aimee J ForemanExact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI, USA.
Christy RussellExact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI, USA.
Dipankar BandyopadhyayMassey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Xiaoyan DengMassey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Lisa FloydEmory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Amelia ZelnakAtlanta Cancer Care, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Harry BearMassey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Ruth O'ReganUniversity of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Virginia Commonwealth University · USEmory University · USExact Sciences (United States) · USOchsner Medical Center · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe role of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in the treatment of patients with early-stage, hormone receptor-positive (HR +) breast cancer is not well defined. Tools to better determine which patients may benefit from neoadjuvant endocrine therapy versus chemotherapy or upfront surgery remain an unmet need.

methodsWe assessed the rate of clinical and pathologic complete response (cCR, pCR) among a pooled cohort of patients with early-stage HR + breast cancer who had been randomized to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy in two earlier studies to understand better how outcomes varied by Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® assay.

resultsWe observed that patients with intermediate RS results had no statistically significant differences in pathologic outcomes at the time of surgery based on whether they received neoadjuvant endocrine therapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy, suggesting that a subgroup of women with a RS 0-25 may omit chemotherapy without compromising outcomes.

conclusionThese data suggest that Recurrence Score® (RS) results may serve as a useful tool in treatment decision-making in the neoadjuvant setting.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisEndocrine therapyHormone receptor-positive breast cancerNeoadjuvant therapyOncotypeRecurrence Score

Identifiers

PMID36897465
PMCPMC10147793
OpenAlexW4323809635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.