Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36897428›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2023

A prospective study to identify preoperative serum parameters for spinal implant infection detected by sonication fluid culture.

Daniel García-Pérez, Guillermo García-Posadas, Rafael San-Juan, Patricia Brañas, Irene Panero-Pérez, Juan Delgado-Fernández, Igor Paredes

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel García-PérezDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, 12 de Octubre, Avda de Córdoba S/N, 28041, Madrid, Spain. dgp.neurosurgery@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0298-5283
Guillermo García-PosadasDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, 12 de Octubre, Avda de Córdoba S/N, 28041, Madrid, Spain.
Rafael San-JuanUnit of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital, 12 de Octubre, Avda de Córdoba S/N, 28041, Madrid, Spain.
Patricia BrañasDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital, 12 de Octubre, Avda de Córdoba S/N, 28041, Madrid, Spain.
Irene Panero-PérezDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, 12 de Octubre, Avda de Córdoba S/N, 28041, Madrid, Spain.
Juan Delgado-FernándezDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, 12 de Octubre, Avda de Córdoba S/N, 28041, Madrid, Spain.
Igor ParedesDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, 12 de Octubre, Avda de Córdoba S/N, 28041, Madrid, Spain.
Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLow-virulent microorganisms identified on pedicle screws by sonication fluid culture (SFC) are an important cause of implant loosening. While sonication of explanted material improves the detection rate, the risk of contamination exists and no standardized diagnostic criteria for chronic low-grade spinal implant-related infection (CLGSII) are stablished. Besides, the role of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) in CLGSII has not been adequately investigated.

methodsBlood samples were collected prior to implant removal. To increase sensitivity, the explanted screws were sonicated and processed separately. Patients exhibiting at least one positive SFC were classified in the infection group (loose criteria). To increase specificity, the strict criteria only considered multiple positive SFC (≥ 3 implants and/or ≥ 50% of explanted devices) as meaningful for CLGSII. Factors which might promote implant infection were also recorded.

resultsThirty-six patients and 200 screws were included. Among them, 18 (50%) patients had any positive SFCs (loose criteria), whereas 11 (31%) patients fulfilled the strict criteria for CLGSII. Higher serum protein level was the most accurate marker for the preoperative detection of CLGSSI, exhibiting an area under the curve of 0.702 (loose criteria) and 0.819 (strict criteria) for the diagnosis of CLGSII. CRP only exhibited a modest accuracy, whereas PCT was not a reliable biomarker. Patient history (spinal trauma, ICU hospitalization and/or previous wound-related complications) increased the likelihood of CLGSII.

conclusionMarkers of systemic inflammation (serum protein level) and patient history should be employed to stratify preoperative risk of CLGSII and decide the best treatment strategy.

Indexed as

Prosthesis-Related InfectionsDevice RemovalHumansProspective StudiesProstheses and ImplantsSonicationC-reactive proteinLaboratory markerLow-grade infectionPedicle screw looseningProcalcitoninSonication

Identifiers

PMID36897428
OpenAlexW4323808233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.