Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36897370›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2023

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy mesh excision step-by-step.

Stefan Mohr, Sara Imboden, Michael D Mueller, Annette Kuhn

Open access · hybridAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stefan MohrDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inselspital, Bern University Women's Hospital, University of Bern, Friedbühlstrasse 19, 3010, Bern, Switzerland. stefan.mohr@insel.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-7218-4908
Sara ImbodenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inselspital, Bern University Women's Hospital, University of Bern, Friedbühlstrasse 19, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Michael D MuellerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inselspital, Bern University Women's Hospital, University of Bern, Friedbühlstrasse 19, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Annette KuhnDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inselspital, Bern University Women's Hospital, University of Bern, Friedbühlstrasse 19, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
University of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThe objective was to demonstrate the surgical procedure of laparoscopic mesh removal after sacrocolpopexy to aid clinicians facing mesh complications.

methodsVideo footage shows the laparoscopic management of mesh failure and mesh erosion after sacrocolpopexy with narrated video sequences of two patients.

resultsLaparoscopic sacrocolpopexy represents the gold standard in advanced prolapse repair. Mesh complications occur infrequently but infections, failure of prolapse repair and mesh erosions necessitate mesh removal and repeat sacrocolpopexy if applicable. The video deals with two women referred to our tertiary referral urogynecology unit in the University Women's Hospital of Bern, Switzerland, after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexies that were carried out in remote hospitals. Both patients were asymptomatic more than 1 year after surgery.

conclusionsComplete mesh removal after sacrocolpopexy and repeat prolapse surgery can be challenging but is feasible and is aimed at improving patients' complaints and symptoms.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyPelvic Organ ProlapseUterine ProlapseFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansSurgical MeshTreatment OutcomeVaginaMesh complicationMinimally invasive mesh excisionPelvic organ prolapsePOPRepeat surgery

Identifiers

PMID36897370
PMCPMC10415470
OpenAlexW4323812831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.