Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36896934›Full record

ReviewGut microbes

Efficacy of

Susan Mills, Bo Yang, Graeme J Smith, Catherine Stanton, R Paul Ross

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gut microbes. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. A phase II clinical trial ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2025
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. [Dynamic changes in gut microbiota from 1 to 12 months of age in preterm infants].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Probiotic Strains.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Susan MillsAPC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Bo YangState Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, School of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China.
Graeme J SmithNEOM Food Sector, NEOM, Tabuk, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Catherine StantonAPC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
R Paul RossAPC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-4876-8839

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The significance of

Indexed as

Bifidobacterium longumGastrointestinal MicrobiomeProbioticsBifidobacteriumFatty Acids, VolatileHumansInfant, NewbornFatty Acids, VolatileBifidobacteriumBifidobacterium longum ssp. infantisBifidobacterium longum ssp. longumCardiovascular diseaseCognitive impairmentGut microbiotaHealthImmunityNecrotizing enterocolitisNeonateProbiotic

Identifiers

PMID36896934
PMCPMC10012958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read98
identifiers read21
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.