SynthesisBioscience reports2023
Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T and A1298C polymorphisms and gastric cancer susceptibility: an updated meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Bioscience reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unveiling the link: Evaluating MTHFR gene polymorphisms and colorectal cancer risk through meta-analysis.PloS one · 2025Pooled it
- Construction of a risk model based on folate metabolism-related genes to predict prognosis and immunological characteristics of stomach adenocarcinoma.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Homocysteine levels and cancer risk in hypertensive adults across MTHFR C677T genotypes.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Prognostic significance ofTranslational cancer research · 2025Article
- MTHFR Gene Polymorphisms: A Single Gene with Wide-Ranging Clinical Implications-A Review.Genes · 2025Review
- Association of Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (Pediatric reports · 2024Article
- Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) polymorphisms in andrology-a narrative review.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Widely regarded as one of the most prevalent malignancies worldwide, gastric cancer (GC) is a common clinical condition of the digestive system. Reviewing 14 meta-analyses that evaluated the association between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene polymorphisms and GC risk, we observed inconsistent results, and the credibility of the significant correlation between the statistical results was ignored. With the aim of further exploring the association between MTHFR C677T and A1298C and the risk of GC, we searched electronic databases, pooling 43 relevant studies and calculating odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each of the five genetic models. Subgroup and regression analyses were performed to look for sources of heterogeneity and publication bias was assessed by funnel plots. To assess the plausibility of statistically significant associations, we used the FPRP test and the Venice criteria. Overall data analysis showed that MTHFR C677T polymorphism was significantly associated with GC risk, especially in Asians, while MTHFR A1298C polymorphism was not associated with GC risk. However, in subgroup analysis by hospital-based controls, we found that MTHFR A1298C might be a protective factor for GC. After credibility assessment, the statistical association between MTHFR C677T and GC susceptibility study was classified as 'less credible positive result', while the result of MTHFR A1298C was considered unreliable. In summary, the present study strongly suggests that MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms are not significantly associated with the GC risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.