Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36896808›Full record

SynthesisJournal of global health2023

Effectiveness of breathing exercise on the duration of labour: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Alwin Issac, Shalini Ganesh Nayak, Priyadarshini T, Deepthy Balakrishnan, Kurvatteppa Halemani, Prabhakar Mishra, Indumathi P, Vijay Vr, Jaison Jacob, Shine Stephen

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Pilates exercise in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alwin IssacAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
Shalini Ganesh NayakAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Gorakhpur, India.
Priyadarshini TAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
Deepthy BalakrishnanAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
Kurvatteppa HalemaniSanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.
Prabhakar MishraSanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.
Indumathi PAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
Vijay VrAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
Jaison JacobAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
Shine StephenAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar · INSanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prolonged labour intensifies labour pain, and failure to address labour pain may lead to abnormal labour and augments the usage of operative interventions. Prolonged labour is common among women, resulting in maternal morbidity, increased caesarean section (CS) rates, and postpartum complications. It may bring forth negative birth experiences that may increase the preference for CS. There is a dearth of evidence concerning the effectiveness of breathing exercises on the duration of labor. As per our knowledge, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of breathing exercises on the duration of labor. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to appraise the evidence concerning the effectiveness of breathing exercises on the duration of labour. Methods: Electronic databases MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and ClinicalKey were searched for randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies published in the English language between January 2005 to March 2022 that reported on the effectiveness of breathing exercises on the duration of labour. Duration of labour was the primary analysed outcome. The secondary outcomes assessed were anxiety, duration of pain, APGAR scores, episiotomy, and mode of delivery. Meta-analysis was done using RevMan v5.3. Results: The reviewed trials involved 1418 participants, and the study participants ranged from 70 to 320. The mean gestational weeks of the participants among the reported trials was 38.9 weeks. Breathing exercise shortened the duration of the intervention group's second stage of labour compared with the control group. Conclusions: Breathing exercise is a beneficial preventive intervention in shortening the duration of second stage of labour. Registration: The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021247126).

Indexed as

Labor, ObstetricLabor PainBreathing ExercisesCesarean SectionFemaleHumansPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID36896808
PMCPMC9999308
OpenAlexW4323807106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.