Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36896773›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular medicine2023

[Corrigendum] A simplified 3D liver microsphere tissue culture model for hepatic cell signaling and drug-induced hepatotoxicity studies.

Ying Zhu, Qiong Shi, Qi Peng, Yue Gao, Ting Yang, Yu Cheng, Hao Wang, Yetao Luo, Ailong Huang, Tong-Chuan He and 1 more

Abstract readPublished Erratum
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ying ZhuMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of diagnostic Medicine, School of Laboratory Medicine, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, P.R. China.
Qiong ShiMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of diagnostic Medicine, School of Laboratory Medicine, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, P.R. China.
Qi PengMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of diagnostic Medicine, School of Laboratory Medicine, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, P.R. China.
Yue GaoMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of diagnostic Medicine, School of Laboratory Medicine, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, P.R. China.
Ting YangMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of diagnostic Medicine, School of Laboratory Medicine, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, P.R. China.
Yu ChengMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of diagnostic Medicine, School of Laboratory Medicine, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, P.R. China.
Hao WangMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of diagnostic Medicine, School of Laboratory Medicine, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, P.R. China.
Yetao Luodepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Management, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, P.R. China.
Ailong HuangKey Laboratory of Molecular Biology for Infectious diseases of The Ministry of Education of china, Institute for Viral Hepatitis, Department of Infectious Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400037, P.R. China.
Tong-Chuan HeMolecular Oncology Laboratory, department of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Chicago Medical center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Jiaming FanMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of diagnostic Medicine, School of Laboratory Medicine, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following the publication of the above article, an interested reader drew to the authors' attention that the 'Sift80, Day 7 / 10% FBS' data panel in Fig. 1Ba looked strikingly similar to the 'Sift80, 2% BCS / Day 3' data panel shown in Fig. 1Bb. After having re‑examined their original data, the authors have realized that they inadvertently duplicated the data panel that correctly showed the results of the 'Sift80, Day 7 / 10% FBS' experiment in this figure. Therefore, the revised version of Fig. 1, now showing the correct data for the 'Sift80, 2% BCS / Day 3' panel, is shown on the next page. Note that the error made in assembling this figure did not affect the overall conclusions reported in the paper. All the authors agree with the publication of this corrigendum, and are grateful to the Editor of

Indexed as

exogenous investigationhepatotoxicity predictionprimary liver tissue culture

Identifiers

PMID36896773
PMCPMC10035984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.