Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36896753›Full record

SynthesisHuman brain mapping2023

Transcranial magnetic stimulation-evoked electroencephalography responses as biomarkers for epilepsy: A review of study design and outcomes.

Silvano R Gefferie, Diego Jiménez-Jiménez, Gerhard H Visser, Robert M Helling, Josemir W Sander, Simona Balestrini, Roland D Thijs

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Human brain mapping, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Clinical utility and prospective of TMS-EEG: Updated review from an international expert group.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Silvano R GefferieStichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (SEIN), Heemstede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0881-9315
Diego Jiménez-JiménezDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Gerhard H VisserStichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (SEIN), Heemstede, The Netherlands.
Robert M HellingStichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (SEIN), Heemstede, The Netherlands.
Josemir W SanderStichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (SEIN), Heemstede, The Netherlands.
Simona BalestriniDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5639-1969
Roland D ThijsStichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (SEIN), Heemstede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1435-8970
Leiden University Medical Center · NLStichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland · NLMeyer Children's Hospital · ITNational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBSichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with electroencephalography (EEG), that is TMS-EEG, may assist in managing epilepsy. We systematically reviewed the quality of reporting and findings in TMS-EEG studies on people with epilepsy and healthy controls, and on healthy individuals taking anti-seizure medication. We searched the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed and Web of Science databases for original TMS-EEG studies comparing people with epilepsy and healthy controls, and healthy subjects before and after taking anti-seizure medication. Studies should involve quantitative analyses of TMS-evoked EEG responses. We evaluated the reporting of study population characteristics and TMS-EEG protocols (TMS sessions and equipment, TMS trials and EEG protocol), assessed the variation between protocols, and recorded the main TMS-EEG findings. We identified 20 articles reporting 14 unique study populations and TMS methodologies. The median reporting rate for the group of people with epilepsy parameters was 3.5/7 studies and for the TMS parameters was 13/14 studies. TMS protocols varied between studies. Fifteen out of 28 anti-seizure medication trials in total were evaluated with time-domain analyses of single-pulse TMS-EEG data. Anti-seizure medication significantly increased N45, and decreased N100 and P180 component amplitudes but in marginal numbers (N45: 8/15, N100: 7/15, P180: 6/15). Eight articles compared people with epilepsy and controls using different analyses, thus limiting comparability. The reporting quality and methodological uniformity between studies evaluating TMS-EEG as an epilepsy biomarker is poor. The inconsistent findings question the validity of TMS-EEG as an epilepsy biomarker. To demonstrate TMS-EEG clinical applicability, methodology and reporting standards are required.

Indexed as

EpilepsyTranscranial Magnetic StimulationBiomarkersElectroencephalographyHumansResearch DesignBiomarkersanti-seizure medicationevoked potentialnon-invasivepharmaco-electroencephalography

Identifiers

PMID36896753
PMCPMC10171534
OpenAlexW4323807859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.