Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36896661›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc2023

Measuring 25-hydroxyvitamin D in cats: comparison of a whole-blood lateral flow assay, 2 dried-blood-spot tests, and serum LC-MS/MS.

Hannah Brodlie, Jessica Quimby, Adam J Rudinsky, Rene E Paschall, Katelyn Brusach, Hannah Klein, Jenessa A Winston, Valerie J Parker

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hannah BrodlieDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Jessica QuimbyDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Adam J RudinskyDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Rene E PaschallDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Katelyn BrusachDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Hannah KleinDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Jenessa A WinstonDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Valerie J ParkerDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6505-8068
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measuring 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25D) can be a challenge in veterinary medicine because of laboratory accessibility and required sample volume. We compared 2 dried-blood-spot (DBS) tests and a lateral flow assay (LFA) to the gold standard, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). We hypothesized that there would be good agreement among the tests, within a clinically significant limit of agreement of ± 25 nmol/L. We collected blood from 6 healthy purpose-bred 2-y-old cats at 6 times over 6 wk, and measured 25D concentrations with all 4 tests. Agreement of the 3 candidate tests and LC-MS/MS was evaluated via Bland-Altman analysis, Passing-Bablok regression, and Lin correlation coefficients. Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated that the mean bias was >± 25 nmol/L for all 3 candidate tests in comparison to serum LC-MS/MS concentrations. The 95% CIs for the mean bias did not include zero, further supporting the presence of significant bias among methods. Additionally, all 3 tests had poor agreement with serum LC-MS/MS concentrations when analyzed by Lin correlation coefficient analysis, and bias between methods was further characterized by Passing-Bablok analysis. Based on these results, none of these 3 tests is recommended as an alternative to LC-MS/MS testing for 25D measurement in cats.

Indexed as

Tandem Mass SpectrometryVitamin DAnimalsCatsChromatography, LiquidSerum25-hydroxyvitamin DVitamin Dcatsdried-blood-spot testlateral flow assayvitamin D

Identifiers

PMID36896661
PMCPMC10185994
OpenAlexW4323809337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.