Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36896361›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2022

Recommendations for Evaluation and Selection of Deceased Organ Donor: Position Statement of ISCCM.

Kapil G Zirpe, Anand M Tiwari, Rahul A Pandit, Deepak Govil, Rajesh C Mishra, Srinivas Samavedam, Palepu B Gopal, Atul P Kulkarni, Subramanian Swaminathan, Subhal B Dixit and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Think Globally, Adapt Locally: The ISCCM Guidelines and Position Statements.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  3. Management of Potential Organ Donor: Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine-Position Statement.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Kapil G ZirpeDepartment of Neuro Trauma Unit, Grant Medical Foundation, Pune, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8140-727X
Anand M TiwariDepartment of Neuro Trauma Unit, Ruby Hall Clinic, Pune, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9791-8365
Rahul A PanditDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Fortis Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5846-3708
Deepak GovilInstitute of Critical Care and Anesthesia, Medanta - The Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4624-1614
Rajesh C MishraDepartment of MICU, Shaibya Comprehensive Care Clinic, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6305-5998
Srinivas SamavedamDepartment of Critical Care, Virinchi Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6737-8663
Palepu B GopalHyderabad, Telangana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5261-1730
Atul P KulkarniDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5172-7619
Subramanian SwaminathanDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Gleneagles Global Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7971-6842
Subhal B DixitDepartment of Critical Care, Sanjeevan and MJM Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1441-0807
Arindam KarCalcutta Medical Research Institute, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0979-2927
Rajesh K PandeDepartment of Critical Care, BLK Superspeciality Hospital, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0149-727X
Dhruva ChaudhryDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5138-2908

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a wide gap between patients who need transplants and the organs that are available in India. Extending the standard donation criterion is certainly important to address the scarcity of organs for transplantation. Intensivists play a major role in the success of deceased donor organ transplants. Recommendations for deceased donor organ evaluation are not discussed in most intensive care guidelines. The purpose of this position statement is to establish current evidence-based recommendations for multiprofessional critical care staff in the evaluation, assessment, and selection of potential organ donors. These recommendations will give "real-world" criteria that are acceptable in the Indian context. The aim of this set of recommendations is to both increase the number and enhance the quality of transplantable organs. How to cite this article: Zirpe KG, Tiwari AM, Pandit RA, Govil D, Mishra RC, Samavedam S,

Indexed as

Brain deathDonor ageDonor evaluationExpanded criteria donorIntensivistTransplantation

Identifiers

PMID36896361
PMCPMC9989874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.