Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36896329›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Screening the risk of obstructive sleep apnea by utilizing supervised learning techniques based on anthropometric features and snoring events.

Cheng-Yu Tsai, Wen-Te Liu, Wen-Hua Hsu, Arnab Majumdar, Marc Stettler, Kang-Yun Lee, Wun-Hao Cheng, Dean Wu, Hsin-Chien Lee, Yi-Chun Kuan and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. How to objectively measure snoring: a systematic review.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Navigating Legitimacy in the Development of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Diagnostics: A Qualitative Study.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Cheng-Yu TsaiDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Wen-Te LiuSchool of Respiratory Therapy, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wen-Hua HsuSchool of Respiratory Therapy, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Arnab MajumdarDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Marc StettlerDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Kang-Yun LeeDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Wun-Hao ChengGraduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Dean WuSleep Center, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Hsin-Chien LeeDepartment of Psychiatry, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yi-Chun KuanSleep Center, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Cheng-Jung WuDepartment of Otolaryngology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Yi-Chih LinDepartment of Otolaryngology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7292-6879
Shu-Chuan HoSchool of Respiratory Therapy, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1616-8647
Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital · TWImperial College London · GBTaipei Medical University · TWTaipei Medical University Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is typically diagnosed by polysomnography (PSG). However, PSG is time-consuming and has some clinical limitations. This study thus aimed to establish machine learning models to screen for the risk of having moderate-to-severe and severe OSA based on easily acquired features. Methods: We collected PSG data on 3529 patients from Taiwan and further derived the number of snoring events. Their baseline characteristics and anthropometric measures were obtained, and correlations among the collected variables were investigated. Next, six common supervised machine learning techniques were utilized, including random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), k-nearest neighbor (kNN), support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR), and naïve Bayes (NB). First, data were independently separated into a training and validation dataset (80%) and a test dataset (20%). The approach with the highest accuracy in the training and validation phase was employed to classify the test dataset. Next, feature importance was investigated by calculating the Shapley value of every factor, which represented the impact on OSA risk screening. Results: The RF produced the highest accuracy (of >70%) in the training and validation phase in screening for both OSA severities. Hence, we employed the RF to classify the test dataset, and results showed a 79.32% accuracy for moderate-to-severe OSA and 74.37% accuracy for severe OSA. Snoring events and the visceral fat level were the most and second most essential features of screening for OSA risk. Conclusions: The established model can be considered for screening for the risk of having moderate-to-severe or severe OSA.

Indexed as

anthropometric measuremachine learningObstructive sleep apneaShapley valuesnoring event

Identifiers

PMID36896329
PMCPMC9989412
OpenAlexW4323341349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.