ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2023
Current management of concomitant cholelithiasis and common bile duct stones.
Review in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Safety and efficacy comparison of single-stage and two-stage ERCP combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Transcystic papillary balloon dilatation vs. laparoscopic choledochoscopy for choledocholithiasis: a retrospective observational propensity score-matched cohort study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Observational
- Impact of acute cholangitis severity on the safety of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure: a stratified retrospective study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and primary suture versus ERCP combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis: a retrospective comparative study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes of immediate, 24-h, and 24-72-h laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic stone clearance: a matched cohort analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Laparoscopic primary suture versus T-tube drainage for choledocholithiasis: a comparative analysis of efficacy and safety.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Post-Cholecystectomy Mirizzi Syndrome by Calculus in the Remaining Cystic Duct: Case Report and Review of Literature.Case reports in surgery · 2026Article
- Life-Threatening Biliary Peritonitis Following T-tube Removal: A Case Report and Literature Review.Cureus · 2025Article
- Article
- Association between hereditary spherocytosis and gallstone disease: Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Review
- Current opinions on the use of prophylactic antibiotics in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Laparoendoscopic Rendezvous: An Effective and Safe Approach in the Management of Cholecysto-Choledocholithiasis in Selected Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Comparative analysis of minimally invasive approaches for gallbladder and common bile duct stones: combined endoscopic techniques vs. ERCP with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- A case of rare obstructive jaundice induced by concealed displacement of T-tube.Journal of surgical case reports · 2024Article
- Current Gallstone Treatment Methods, State of the Art.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus cholangioscopy for the treatment of cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024Article
- Evaluating the efficacy and safety of 2-methoxy-6-methylpyridine: a promising topical agent for gallstone dissolution in a porcine model.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The management policy of concomitant cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis is based on a one- or two-stage procedure. It basically includes either laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with laparoscopic common bile duct (CBD) exploration (LCBDE) in the same operation or LC with preoperative, postoperative and even intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-endoscopic sphincterotomy (ERCP-ES) for stone clearance. The most frequently used worldwide option is preoperative ERCP-ES and stone removal followed by LC, preferably on the next day. In cases where preoperative ERCP-ES is not feasible, the proposed alternative of intraoperative rendezvous ERCP-ES simultaneously with LC has been advocated. The intraoperative extraction of CBD stones is superior to postoperative rendezvous ERCP-ES. However, there is no consensus on the superiority of laparoendoscopic rendezvous. This is equivalent to a traditional two-stage procedure. Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation reduces recurrence. LCBDE and intraoperative ERCP have similar good outcomes. The risk of recurrence after ERCP-ES is greater than that after LCBDE. Laparoscopic ultrasonography may delineate the anatomy and detect CBD stones. The majority of surgeons prefer the transcductal instead of the transcystic approach for CBDE with or without T-tube drainage, but the transcystic approach must be used where possible. LCBDE is a safe and effective choice when performed by an experienced surgeon. However, the requirement of specific equipment and advanced training are drawbacks. The percutaneous approach is an alternative when ERCP fails. Surgical or endoscopic reintervention for retained stones may be needed. For asymptomatic CBD stones, ERCP clearance is the first-choice method. Both one-stage and two-stage management are acceptable and can ensure improved quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.