ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2023
Bundle branch block in cardiac arrest survivors without ischemic heart disease.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent highlights on coronary artery disease from theInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Cardiac arrest (CA) survivors with left/right bundle branch block (LBBB/RBBB) and no ischemic heart disease (IHD) have not been previously characterized. The aim of this study was to describe heart failure, implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy and mortality in this population. Methods: Between 2009 and 2019 we consecutively identified all CA survivors with a consistent bundle branch block (BBB) defined as a QRS ≥ 120 ms, who had a secondary prophylactic ICD implanted. Patients with congenital and ischemic heart disease (IHD) were excluded. Results: Among 701 CA-survivors who survived to discharge and received an ICD, a total of 58 (8%) were free from IHD and had BBB; 46 (79%) had LBBB, 10 (17%) had RBBB and 2 (3%) had non-specific BBB (NSBBB). The prevalence of LBBB was 7%. Pre-arrest ECG were available in 34 (59%) patients; 20 patients (59%) had LBBB, 6 (18%) had RBBB, 2 (6%) had NSBBB, 1 had (3%) incomplete LBBB, and 4 (12%) without BBB. At discharge, patients with LBBB had a significantly lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) than patients with other types of BBB, p < 0.001. During follow-up, 7 (12%) died after a median of 3.6 years (IQR: 2.6-5.1) with no difference between BBB subtypes. Conclusion: We identified 58 CA-survivors with BBB and no IHD. The prevalence of LBBB among all CA-survivors was high, 7%. During CA hospitalization LBBB patients presented with a significantly lower LVEF than patients with other types of BBB (P < 0.001). ICD treatment and mortality did not differ between BBB subtypes during follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.