Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36896142›Full record

ArticleBioscience2023

How Social Considerations Improve the Equity and Effectiveness of Ecosystem Restoration.

Sara Löfqvist, Fritz Kleinschroth, Adia Bey, Ariane de Bremond, Ruth DeFries, Jinwei Dong, Forrest Fleischman, Sharachchandra Lele, Dominic A Martin, Peter Messerli and 11 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The impacts of biological invasions.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Navigating data challenges in socioeconomic impact assessments of conservation regimes.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Review
  17. Conceptualizing social risk in relation to climate change and assisted ecosystem adaptation.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Sara LöfqvistEcosystem Management Group, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9006-9452
Fritz KleinschrothEcosystem Management Group, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Adia BeyEarth and Life Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Ariane de BremondDepartment of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States.
Ruth DeFriesDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States.
Jinwei DongInstitute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resource Research of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Forrest FleischmanDepartment of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, St Paul, Minnesota, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6060-4031
Sharachchandra LeleShiv Nadar University Delhi, NCR, Gautam Buddha Nagar, India.
Dominic A MartinWyss Academy for Nature, University of in Bern, Switzerland.
Peter MesserliWyss Academy for Nature, University of in Bern, Switzerland.
Patrick MeyfroidtEarth and Life Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Marion PfeiferNewcastle University, Newcastle upon Tine, England, United Kingdom.
Sarobidy O RakotonarivoÉcole Supérieure des Sciences Agronomiques, Université d'Antananarivo, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Navin RamankuttyInstitute for Resources, Environment, and Sustainability, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Vijay RamprasadCenter for Ecology, Development, and Research, Ashoka University, Haryana, and with the Kangra Integrated Sciences and Adaptation Network, Kangra, India.
Pushpendra RanaIndian Forest Service, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Jeanine M RhemtullaDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Casey M RyanSchool of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Ima Célia Guimarães VieiraMuseu Paraense Emilio Goeldi, Belém, Para, Brazil.
Geoff J WellsSchool of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Rachael D GarrettEnvironmental Policy Lab, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecosystem restoration is an important means to address global sustainability challenges. However, scientific and policy discourse often overlooks the social processes that influence the equity and effectiveness of restoration interventions. In the present article, we outline how social processes that are critical to restoration equity and effectiveness can be better incorporated in restoration science and policy. Drawing from existing case studies, we show how projects that align with local people's preferences and are implemented through inclusive governance are more likely to lead to improved social, ecological, and environmental outcomes. To underscore the importance of social considerations in restoration, we overlay existing global restoration priority maps, population, and the Human Development Index (HDI) to show that approximately 1.4 billion people, disproportionately belonging to groups with low HDI, live in areas identified by previous studies as being of high restoration priority. We conclude with five action points for science and policy to promote equity-centered restoration.

Indexed as

climate change mitigationland use managementrestoration longevityrestoration policysocial justice

Identifiers

PMID36896142
PMCPMC9991587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.